02.07.2013 Views

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

Reframing Latin America: A Cultural Theory Reading ... - BGSU Blogs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

54 reframing latin america<br />

realist art because they thought they could understand it, but only an elite<br />

few could truly appreciate the fi ner aesthetics of artistic abstraction, as it<br />

was expressed in modern art.<br />

Like Ortega y Gasset’s desire to fi nd the purest art form, essentialists and<br />

hermeneuticians focus on the windowpane in and of itself, valuing most<br />

highly the narrative that they believe reveals truths about the human condition.<br />

Just as the purity of the glass improves our vision of what we see<br />

through it, essentialists believe that the more precise or fl awless the author’s<br />

narrative, the less aware we are of the author and the more we learn<br />

about humanity. This does not mean the narrative style has to be simplistic<br />

or obvious, as evidenced by Ortega y Gasset’s defense of modern art. After<br />

all, Ulysses, the highly challenging work by James Joyce (1922), regularly<br />

appears atop canonical lists of Western narrative.<br />

In Framing the Sign, Jonathan Culler offers a cultural theorist’s approach<br />

to the window metaphor. He compares the context and discourse surrounding<br />

each work of art or narrative to the frame of a window. An important<br />

distinction between Culler and Ortega y Gasset is that, as a cultural theorist,<br />

Culler is not interested in revealing the most pure art form. He is looking<br />

to expose the discourses that shape each narrative. Culler wants our<br />

understanding of narrative to go beyond mere context, such as the historical<br />

events surrounding the creation of a text. Instead, he encourages the reader<br />

to consider the work semiotically by examining the role of discourse in it.<br />

As he explains:<br />

The expression framing the sign has several advantages over context:<br />

it reminds us that framing is something we do; it hints of the frameup<br />

(“falsifying evidence beforehand in order to make someone appear<br />

guilty”), a major use of context; and it eludes the incipient positivism of<br />

“context” by alluding to the semiotic function of framing in art, where<br />

the frame is determining, setting off the object or event as art and yet<br />

the frame itself may be nothing tangible, pure articulation. 4<br />

Semioticians like Culler insist that the frame, the articulation, or the discourse<br />

always mediates the scene or the narrative. A person who chooses to<br />

focus solely on the glass itself, or the scene outside as transparent reality,<br />

rather than also examining the elements constructing and refracting the image,<br />

misses this crucial point. Whereas Ortega y Gasset and other essentialist<br />

modernists believe that there are more or less accurate representations<br />

of the human experience, Culler and other cultural theorists do not rank<br />

narratives. Instead of assuming the existence of an ontological world and<br />

then looking for narratives that reveal it, semiotic narratologists reveal how

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!