Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Project energy context<br />
compared to other countries such as France, Sweden and Belgium where nuclear<br />
power plays a major role in meeting their energy needs 1 .<br />
According to federal government data and analyses 2 , Canada’s GHG emissions were<br />
an estimated 758 Mt of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2004, up 27 percent from 1990,<br />
the Kyoto baseline year, when they were estimated to be 599 Mt. When Canada<br />
ratified the Kyoto Protocol, an appendix to the United Nations Framework Agreement<br />
on climate change, in December 2002, it committed to reduce these emissions by<br />
6 percent compared to the 1990 baseline on the 2012 horizon 3 .<br />
According to federal government data, the energy sector (which includes the highway<br />
transportation sector, the fossil fuel energy industry and thermal generated heat and<br />
electricity) was responsible for 81 percent of total Canadian emissions in 2003, and<br />
91 percent of growth in these emissions between 1991 and 2003. Moreover, these<br />
data show that the intensity of these emissions per unit of gross national product<br />
(GNP) decreased by nearly 12 percent in 2003 as compared to 1990.<br />
Figure 3 provides the territorial breakdown of emissions across Canada according to<br />
the Canadian Environmental Sustainability Indicators program.<br />
With respect to the emissions growth rate by province, data calculated by the Suzuki<br />
Foundation 4 shows that Quebec had the third lowest increase in emissions for all<br />
Canadian provinces and territories during the same period.<br />
1. See, among others:<br />
European Renewable Energy Council, Renewable Energy Policy Review Sweden, May 2004 [On-line:<br />
www.erec-renewables.org/documents/RES_in_EUandCC/Policy_reviews/EU_15/Sweden_policy_final.pdf];<br />
H. Nifenecker, Comparison of the energy structure between Denmark, France and Sweden [On-line:<br />
www.ecolo.org/documents/documents_in_english/Comparison-denmark-france.doc];<br />
International Energy Agency, World Energy Outlook 2006, Summary and Conclusions [On-line: library.iea.org/<br />
textbase/weo/summaries2006/french.pdf].<br />
2. Government of Canada, National Status and Trends [On-line: www.environmentandresources.gc.ca/<br />
default.asp?lang=Fr&n=843A8EEB-1]<br />
3. On April 26, 2007, the Government of Canada announced an action plan to reduce GHG and atmospheric<br />
pollution. The plan calls for an absolute reduction by 150 Mt by 2020.<br />
4. Dale Marshall, All Over the Map: A Comparison of Provincial Climate Change Plans, David Suzuki Foundation,<br />
2005 [On-line: www.davidsuzuki.org/files/climate/Ontario/All_Over_the_Map.pdf].<br />
78 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure