22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Territorial context of the project<br />

From the MIL Davie shipyards in Lévis to Montmagny, highway 132 goes through<br />

rural landscapes with a major natural and heritage component and provides viewing<br />

points for île d’Orléans, which itself is a historic district. No heavy industrial activity<br />

has been established in this part of the land which has maintained its original land<br />

divisions for 350 years. In fact, according to testimony received during the hearing,<br />

the river corridor between Pointe De La Martinière and the eastern end of île<br />

d’Orléans is one of the few sectors of the St. Lawrence River that still presents such<br />

features of historical integrity and continuity.<br />

From this standpoint, the 735-kV electricity transmission line that crosses the river<br />

from île d’Orléans to Beaumont is considered by most of those who referred to it as<br />

an error of the past. For some, the presence of these power lines reduces the quality<br />

of the landscape on the coast of Beaumont in such a way that the LNG terminal<br />

facilities, though visible, would lose some of their impact. For others, the construction<br />

of the terminal would be the equivalent of repeating the error of Hydro-Québec’s<br />

power lines or of installing the equivalent of Ultramar’s Saint-Romuald facilities at<br />

Ville-Guay.<br />

♦ Finding — The Panel notes that the project, with its on-shore and port components,<br />

would be the first development of this type in the high heritage value landscape<br />

along the coast of Beaumont.<br />

Territorial integration issues<br />

Integration of the project in the Ville-Guay sector raises two main issues. One pits the<br />

residential, agricultural, and recreational and tourism use in a permanent agricultural<br />

zone against the establishment of a use that would implement a long-planned<br />

industrial and port development potential. The other pits a highly valued landscape<br />

known for its continuity and integrity against the permanent and visible presence of<br />

LNG terminal facilities.<br />

With respect to the first issue, the Panel concluded 1 that the project corresponds to<br />

the industrial and port designation and uses that are provided for in the applicable<br />

land development plan, municipal Master Plan, and zoning by-law.<br />

With respect to the landscape, though the Ville-Guay sector provides conditions that<br />

meet the requirements for construction of an LNG terminal, the question whether or<br />

1. Subject to the upcoming judgment that could be rendered by the Superior Court in the action brought by cittizens<br />

of Lévis and Beaumont seeking a declaration that the Rabaska project is not in conformance with the City of<br />

Lévis zoning by-law.<br />

Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 113

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!