Opinions of participants area […] this site has been operating on a seasonal basis (June to August) for many years now” (DM545, p. 21). For one participant: The Parc De La Martinière is the only wooded park that has access to the riverbanks in the region of the city of Québec […] opening the door to heavy industry just a few meters from there is in my opinion totally incompatible with the preservation and development of this majestic park, which will attract its share of tourists in the years to come, and will contribute to the population’s well-being. This site is simply amazing! (Ms. Isabelle Carrier, DM624, p. 3) Lastly, some participants wondered about the practice of cross-country skiing in this area (Ms. Francine Dupont, DM109). According to the Sierra Club of Canada, “the Ville-Guay cross-country skiing centre will see part of its trails closed off during the duration of the worksite. The portion in question crosses directly the area where the terminal is planned, and the trail passing in this area joins with the one from Beaumont, which makes for a 15-km itinerary” (DM699, p. 16). The project’s economic spinoffs According to the participants, some of the potential economic spinoffs from the project include job creation, revitalizing the regional economic base, generating revenues for the city of Lévis and other levels of government, providing economic diversification and consolidating expertise companies. On the other hand, some apprehended the negative impacts the project could have on local and regional tourism, as well as on the property value of residences close by. According to some participants, the project’s economic spinoffs would be limited to taxes for the City of Lévis and jobs would only be created during the construction phase. 38 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure
Local and regional economic development Opinions of participants A strong proportion of the social-economic community and of the participants greeted the project’s economic contribution to the overall regional territory favourably 1 . The Chambre de commerce de Lévis stated: We view the Rabaska project as a strategic economic lever to consolidate and diversify our economy. We have, within arm’s reach, a major private investment which is offering jobs to our workers, high-end technology expertise, sizeable fiscal benefits, a long-term advantage for our industries, and decreased access costs to this resource for consumers and companies. This is an exceptional opportunity that we must seize! (DM611, p. 10) The Groupe Perspective underscored the fact that the Rabaska project “represents the biggest investment in the past ten years in the region, and maybe even on a provincial scale” (DM519, p. 3). The major private investment that the project represents was also highlighted by many participants 2 . Moreover, some were of the opinion that the arrival of a project like Rabaska project would contribute to attracting new investors 3 . According to the Jeune chambre de commerce de Québec, “not seizing this opportunity could hurt our credibility, even the possibility of doing other large projects” (DM565, p. 4). For another, “The Rabaska project must be successful, and must be used as a calling card for investors who have given up on Québec for many years, for fear of not being welcomed” (Mr. Régis Cauchon, DM537, p. 9). 1. Fabrication PFL inc., DM207, p. 1; Regroupement d’appui au projet Rabaska, DM156, p. 16; Alu-Rex inc., DM208, p. 4; Machinerie G.A.S., DM216, p. 3; Les Entreprises lévisiennes inc., DM351, p. 3; Ms. Francine Roy, DM232, p. 1; SuperMétal Structures inc., DM300, p. 3; Vitrerie Lévis, DM354, p. 4; Conférence régionale des élus de la Chaudière-Appalaches, DM534; Conseil économique de Beauce and Ville de Saint-Georges, DM19; Mr. Alain Boily, DM29; Mr. Yves Côté, DM76, p. 1; Mr. Denis Lépinay, DM93; Mr. Alfred Bédard, DM98; Mr. Steeve-Michel Côté, DM114, p. 2; Ms. Micheline Dumas, DM129; Ms. Catherine Constantin, DM137, p. 4; Ms. Nathalie Villeneuve, DM157, p. 3; Mr. Richard Leblond, DM172, p. 1; Mr. Éric Leblond, DM211, p. 1; Mr. Michel Lachance, DM228, p. 1; Mr. Marc Paquet, DM242; Ms. Johanne Laflamme, DM250; Ms. Élaine Laflamme, DM256; Mr. Gérard Ruel, DM271, p. 1; Ms. Mélanie Pérusse, DM277; Mr. Jacques Lachance, DM278; Mr. Alain Giroux, DM279; Mr. Pierre Tremblay, DM294; DK-SPEC inc., DM322, p. 3; Ms. Diane Baillargeon, DM328; Honco, DM342, p. 4; Supervac 2000, DM343, p. 4; Sturo Métal, DM344, p. 3; S. Labranche inc., DM345; Les Structures Pelco inc., DM350, p. 3 and 4; Excavation Marcel Vézina inc., DM383; J. M. Demers Excavation inc., DM384; Orizon mobile, DM389; Mr. Dario Dumais, DM420; Côté Isolation inc., DM448, p. 2; Mr. Yves Tessier, DM476, p. 2; Charles-Auguste Fortier inc., DM503, p. 2 and 3; Mr. Martin Vézina, DM511, p. 1; Mr. Hervé Ferland, DM515, p. 1; Transport Jean-Guy Bergeron et Le Groupe Theco inc., DM529; Verreault, DM554, p. 6; Mr. Bastien Barrette, DM562, p. 1; Mr. Ronald Fiset, DM654, p. 1; Mr. Jacky Kenty, DM661, p. 1; Ms. Chantalle De Roy, DM675, p. 1. 2. Mr. Normand Lebrun, DM73, p. 1; Quebec Employers’ Council, DM535, p. 2; Les Équipements EBM, DM61, p. 1; Mr. Guy Pelletier, DM229; Mr. Michel Picard, DM331, p. 1; Mr. André Turcotte, DM428, p. 2. 3. Électricité du St-Laurent ltée, DM96, p. 5; Mr. Jean Lefort, DM140, p. 2; Mr. Normand Lebrun, DM73, p. 2; Mr. Pierre Hébert, DM538, p. 1; Société de développement économique de Lévis, DM545, p. 8; Jeune chambre de commerce de Québec, DM565, p. 3; Mr. Hugo Bellefleur, DM378, p. 2; Mr. Patrick Fontaine, DM396, p. 1; Mr. Ghislain Labonté, DM504, p. 1; Canadian Liquid inc., DM649, p. 2; Mr. Maxime Lapointe, DM664, p. 1. Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 39