22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mr. William J. Cosgrove<br />

President<br />

Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement<br />

Lomer-Gouin Building<br />

575, Saint-Amable Street, Suite 2.10<br />

Quebec, QC G1R 6A6<br />

Dear Mr. Cosgrove:<br />

Édifice Lomer-Gouin<br />

575, rue Saint-Amable, bureau 2.10<br />

Québec (Québec) G1R 6A6<br />

Téléphone : 418 643-7447<br />

(sans frais) : 1 800 463-4732<br />

Télécopieur : 418 643-9474<br />

communication@bape.gouv.qc.ca<br />

www.bape.gouv.qc.ca<br />

Quebec, May 28, 2007<br />

I am pleased to submit to you the report of the Joint Review Panel on the Rabaska Project<br />

– Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure. Having completed its<br />

mandate, the Panel is pleased to note that the project is in line with Quebec’s energy<br />

strategy. The project also conforms to the government’s position and policies that, over<br />

the years, have recognized the importance of strengthening Quebec’s natural gas supply<br />

and diversifying sources of supply. The Panel is of the view that the added supply of gas<br />

from the project could lead to a relative reduction in the price of natural gas on the<br />

Quebec market.<br />

On other matters, the Panel concludes that there are two major project-related issues that<br />

arise: the risks associated with the project; and the integration of port and on-shore<br />

facilities into the area under development. These are two considerations that have a major<br />

influence on the project’s social acceptability within the community.<br />

The Panel is of the opinion that the risk assessment conforms to current recognized<br />

practices in the field. The assessment’s conclusions are also in keeping with the known<br />

historical background of procedures for liquefied natural gas security. On the basis of its<br />

own findings and opinions on emergency measures planning, the Panel judges the risk<br />

associated with the project to be acceptable.<br />

…2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!