- Page 1 and 2: Bureau d’audiences publiques sur
- Page 3: Ms. Line Beauchamp Minister of Sust
- Page 7: Quebec, May 30, 2007 The Honourable
- Page 10 and 11: Table of contents The project’s s
- Page 12 and 13: Table of contents Emergency measure
- Page 15 and 16: List of figures and tables Figure 1
- Page 17 and 18: Opinions and recommendations In its
- Page 19 and 20: Opinions and recommendations The co
- Page 21 and 22: Opinions and recommendations Opinio
- Page 23 and 24: Project impacts on avian fauna Opin
- Page 25: Units of measurement BTU British Th
- Page 28 and 29: Introduction Canadian Minister of t
- Page 30 and 31: Introduction Table 1 Technical char
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 1 Opinions of participants
- Page 39 and 40: Opinions of participants mitigation
- Page 41 and 42: Opinions of participants hearings,
- Page 43 and 44: Opinions of participants gazoduc, e
- Page 45 and 46: Economic considerations Opinions of
- Page 47 and 48: Opinions of participants transporta
- Page 49 and 50: Opinions of participants In contras
- Page 51 and 52: Opinions of participants The Québe
- Page 53 and 54: Opinions of participants Countries
- Page 55 and 56:
Land-use planning and municipal reg
- Page 57 and 58:
Opinions of participants According
- Page 59 and 60:
Opinions of participants an identit
- Page 61 and 62:
Opinions of participants DM394, p.
- Page 63 and 64:
The recreational uses of the area O
- Page 65 and 66:
Local and regional economic develop
- Page 67 and 68:
Job creation Opinions of participan
- Page 69 and 70:
Opinions of participants cryogenics
- Page 71 and 72:
Opinions of participants The Socié
- Page 73 and 74:
The technological risks Opinions of
- Page 75 and 76:
Opinions of participants une gestio
- Page 77 and 78:
Opinions of participants tankers wa
- Page 79 and 80:
Opinions of participants damage the
- Page 81 and 82:
Opinions of participants de Bellech
- Page 83 and 84:
Opinions of participants regarding
- Page 85 and 86:
Opinions of participants the expect
- Page 87 and 88:
Opinions of participants Impacts we
- Page 89 and 90:
Opinions of participants environmen
- Page 91 and 92:
Opinions of participants On this to
- Page 93:
Opinions of participants assess the
- Page 96 and 97:
Project energy context Moreover, ac
- Page 98 and 99:
Project energy context almost half
- Page 100 and 101:
Project energy context Table 4 prov
- Page 102 and 103:
Project energy context supply. Pres
- Page 104 and 105:
Project energy context compared to
- Page 106 and 107:
Project energy context Emissions pr
- Page 108 and 109:
Project energy context Moreover, th
- Page 110 and 111:
Project energy context other fuels
- Page 112:
Economic context of the project Cas
- Page 116 and 117:
Economic context of the project It
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 4 Territorial context of th
- Page 121 and 122:
Territorial context of the project
- Page 123 and 124:
Territorial context of the project
- Page 125 and 126:
Territorial context of the project
- Page 129 and 130:
Issues in dispute Territorial conte
- Page 131 and 132:
Territorial context of the project
- Page 133 and 134:
Landscape unit to which Ville-Guay
- Page 137 and 138:
Territorial context of the project
- Page 139 and 140:
Territorial context of the project
- Page 141 and 142:
Chapter 5 Assessing the risks relat
- Page 143 and 144:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 145 and 146:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 147 and 148:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 149 and 150:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 151 and 152:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 153 and 154:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 155 and 156:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 157 and 158:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 161 and 162:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 163 and 164:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 165 and 166:
Table 8 Inventory of sensitive elem
- Page 169 and 170:
On-land risks Assessing the risks r
- Page 173 and 174:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 175 and 176:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 179 and 180:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 181 and 182:
The accident scenarios considered a
- Page 185 and 186:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 189 and 190:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 191 and 192:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 193 and 194:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 195 and 196:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 197:
Assessing the risks related to the
- Page 200 and 201:
Social acceptance of the project de
- Page 202 and 203:
Social acceptance of the project se
- Page 204 and 205:
Social acceptance of the project im
- Page 207 and 208:
Chapter 7 Impacts on the inhabited
- Page 209 and 210:
Impacts on the inhabited area and h
- Page 211 and 212:
Impacts on the inhabited area and h
- Page 213 and 214:
The regulatory framework Impacts on
- Page 215 and 216:
Impacts on the inhabited area and h
- Page 217 and 218:
Impacts on the inhabited area and h
- Page 219 and 220:
Long-term cumulative impacts Impact
- Page 221 and 222:
Impacts on the inhabited area and h
- Page 223 and 224:
Impacts on the inhabited area and h
- Page 225 and 226:
Chapter 8 Impacts on the natural en
- Page 229 and 230:
Pipeline right-of-way Impacts on th
- Page 233 and 234:
Impact of storage tank installation
- Page 235 and 236:
Impacts on the natural environment
- Page 237 and 238:
Impacts on the natural environment
- Page 239 and 240:
Impacts on the natural environment
- Page 241 and 242:
Fish habitat in a lotic environment
- Page 243 and 244:
Impacts on the natural environment
- Page 245 and 246:
Inventories conducted Impacts on th
- Page 247 and 248:
Impacts on the natural environment
- Page 249 and 250:
Impacts on the natural environment
- Page 251 and 252:
Conclusion In conclusion of its man
- Page 253:
Rabaska Project - Implementation of
- Page 256:
References EB EXPERTS-CONSEILS, in