Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Opinions of participants<br />
de Bellechasse and the CLD de la MRC recommended that a representative<br />
designated by the MRC de Bellechasse be asked to be part of this committee<br />
(DM560, p. 8).<br />
The quality of life and health of residents living nearby<br />
Several participants related various concerns regarding the project’s possible impacts<br />
on the noise environment, atmospheric emissions and dust, as well as night time<br />
brightness. Some residents 1 feared that their living environment would be disrupted,<br />
and apprehended the project’s impacts on their quality of life. Moreover, some<br />
concerns were related to the project’s impacts on the population’s health. Some<br />
participants also thought that health aspects had been underestimated in the impact<br />
study (Ms. Isabelle Pouliot, DM380, p. 3; Mr. Éric Tessier, DM600, p. 14).<br />
Regarding quality of life, some residents 2 specified that one of the major aspects which<br />
had motivated them to live in the area was that it was peaceful. The project’s arrival in this<br />
area, deemed to be peaceful by many, worried them: “the inevitable increase in traffic<br />
over a very long period of time […] will certainly result in constant noise, vibrations,<br />
dust, increased risks of accidents, heavy goods vehicle traffic, traffic in general, etc.”<br />
(Ms. Annie Marcoux and Mr. André Voros, DM631, p. 5). Several were of the opinion<br />
that the noise impact will be far greater than the one assessed by the proponent:<br />
There is a problem of expected, stated and recognized noise excesses during the<br />
construction phase, mainly for the jetty. The population doesn’t have any<br />
protection against noise excesses, and if the project gets the green light, citizens<br />
will have to suffer consequences to their health, which have been identified as<br />
harmful to human health by the international scientific community.<br />
(APPEL, DM459, p. 13)<br />
Regarding noise impact, the <strong>Agence</strong>s de la santé et des services sociaux de<br />
Chaudière-Appalaches et de la Capitale-Nationale specified that “the ambient noise<br />
environment expected for residential neighbourhoods surrounding the Rabaska LNG<br />
terminal facilities will likely result in negative impacts on health, such as disturbing the<br />
sleep of residents, which can, in turn, result in a series of other latent effects (DM602,<br />
p. 78). The École Sainte-Famille located nearby was especially sensitive to the noise<br />
and peacefulness aspects, to ensure the optimal learning environment for its students<br />
(DM146, p .5).<br />
1. Ms. Lucie Létourneau, DM200, p. 3; Mr. Michel Riou, DM370, p. 2; Les AmiEs de la terre de Québec, DM625,<br />
p. 51 to 59; <strong>Agence</strong>s de la santé et des services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches et de la Capitale-Nationale,<br />
DM602, p. 33 to 48; Ms. Céline Drouin, DM362, p. 1.<br />
2. Mr. Louis Bastien, DM108, p. 2; Mr. Rosaire Gauthier, DM412, p. 4; Mr. Jean-Guy Allard, DM24, p. 1; Ms. Louise<br />
Cazelais Côté, Mr. Réal Côté and Ms. Stéphanie Côté, DM177, p. 2; Ms. Hélène Létourneau and Mr. Daniel<br />
Cantin, DM27, p. 2.<br />
Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 55