22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Opinions of participants<br />

de Bellechasse and the CLD de la MRC recommended that a representative<br />

designated by the MRC de Bellechasse be asked to be part of this committee<br />

(DM560, p. 8).<br />

The quality of life and health of residents living nearby<br />

Several participants related various concerns regarding the project’s possible impacts<br />

on the noise environment, atmospheric emissions and dust, as well as night time<br />

brightness. Some residents 1 feared that their living environment would be disrupted,<br />

and apprehended the project’s impacts on their quality of life. Moreover, some<br />

concerns were related to the project’s impacts on the population’s health. Some<br />

participants also thought that health aspects had been underestimated in the impact<br />

study (Ms. Isabelle Pouliot, DM380, p. 3; Mr. Éric Tessier, DM600, p. 14).<br />

Regarding quality of life, some residents 2 specified that one of the major aspects which<br />

had motivated them to live in the area was that it was peaceful. The project’s arrival in this<br />

area, deemed to be peaceful by many, worried them: “the inevitable increase in traffic<br />

over a very long period of time […] will certainly result in constant noise, vibrations,<br />

dust, increased risks of accidents, heavy goods vehicle traffic, traffic in general, etc.”<br />

(Ms. Annie Marcoux and Mr. André Voros, DM631, p. 5). Several were of the opinion<br />

that the noise impact will be far greater than the one assessed by the proponent:<br />

There is a problem of expected, stated and recognized noise excesses during the<br />

construction phase, mainly for the jetty. The population doesn’t have any<br />

protection against noise excesses, and if the project gets the green light, citizens<br />

will have to suffer consequences to their health, which have been identified as<br />

harmful to human health by the international scientific community.<br />

(APPEL, DM459, p. 13)<br />

Regarding noise impact, the <strong>Agence</strong>s de la santé et des services sociaux de<br />

Chaudière-Appalaches et de la Capitale-Nationale specified that “the ambient noise<br />

environment expected for residential neighbourhoods surrounding the Rabaska LNG<br />

terminal facilities will likely result in negative impacts on health, such as disturbing the<br />

sleep of residents, which can, in turn, result in a series of other latent effects (DM602,<br />

p. 78). The École Sainte-Famille located nearby was especially sensitive to the noise<br />

and peacefulness aspects, to ensure the optimal learning environment for its students<br />

(DM146, p .5).<br />

1. Ms. Lucie Létourneau, DM200, p. 3; Mr. Michel Riou, DM370, p. 2; Les AmiEs de la terre de Québec, DM625,<br />

p. 51 to 59; <strong>Agence</strong>s de la santé et des services sociaux de Chaudière-Appalaches et de la Capitale-Nationale,<br />

DM602, p. 33 to 48; Ms. Céline Drouin, DM362, p. 1.<br />

2. Mr. Louis Bastien, DM108, p. 2; Mr. Rosaire Gauthier, DM412, p. 4; Mr. Jean-Guy Allard, DM24, p. 1; Ms. Louise<br />

Cazelais Côté, Mr. Réal Côté and Ms. Stéphanie Côté, DM177, p. 2; Ms. Hélène Létourneau and Mr. Daniel<br />

Cantin, DM27, p. 2.<br />

Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!