22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Impacts on the natural environment<br />

♦ Recommendation 16 — The Panel recommends that the proponent assess the<br />

cumulative environmental effects of the two projects related to his own, i.e. the two<br />

power distribution lines and the access road leading to the terminal as regards the<br />

extent of deforestation required.<br />

Project impacts on water environments<br />

Hydrology of the ruisseau Saint-Claude<br />

The ruisseau Saint-Claude (Figure 13) is the main creek likely to be affected by the<br />

construction of the terminal. A 955-m long segment of the western branch of the creek<br />

would be diverted to bypass the facilities to the south. A new 975-m long bed would<br />

be excavated to bypass the terminal to the west and to the south. The proponent is of<br />

the view that these changes would not modify the remainder of the hydrographic<br />

basin feeding this portion of the ruisseau Saint-Claude and would not significantly<br />

modify its hydrology. Further downstream of the portion to be diverted, the basins<br />

excavated to receive the storage tanks would intercept part of the local groundwater<br />

at an estimated 0.007 m 3 /s flow rate in permanent regime. The proponent plans to<br />

discharge this water into the ruisseau Saint-Claude, whose mean flow rate is at an<br />

estimated 0.40 m 3 /s, 6 m 3 /s during the annual high water period and 0.02 m 3 /s during low<br />

flow periods. In the latter case, a slight increase would occur, due to the planned discharge<br />

(PR3.3.1, p. 2.22, 2.23 and 6.29; PR5.1, p. 3.39 to 3.40).<br />

The MRNF said it was concerned by the impact of the groundwater drawdown on the<br />

refuge pond located south-west of the creek and suggested that the pumped water be<br />

discharged partly into the ruisseau Saint-Claude and partly into the refuge pond to<br />

preserve these two ecosystems (DQ62.1). Moreover, the proponent suggested<br />

different solutions to maintain an acceptable water balance in the ruisseau<br />

Saint-Claude during the construction and operation phases of the terminal. However,<br />

no information was provided on the impacts that interruption or abandonment of<br />

terminal operations would have on the management of the ruisseau Saint-Claude flow<br />

rate. Since the solutions put forward involve management of the flow rate, questions<br />

persist in regard to the maintenance of an acceptable flow rate in the ruisseau Saint-<br />

Claude when this pumping would be interrupted due to an operational shutdown.<br />

♦ Recommendation 17 — The Panel recommends that the proponent develop a<br />

management plan that would ensure the maintenance of an acceptable flow rate in the<br />

ruisseau Saint-Claude and the integrity of the refuge pond. This management plan should<br />

be to the satisfaction of Fisheries and Oceans Canada, the ministère du Développement<br />

durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs and the ministère des Ressources naturelles et de<br />

la Faune, and should cover the terminal construction, operation and abandonment phases.<br />

204 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!