Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Impacts on the inhabited area and human activities
Lévis apparently has also negotiated the development of land facilities with the
proponent for times when passage is not possible due to a tanker’s presence at the
jetty. On this point, Transport Canada has said no craft will be authorized to pass
when an LNG tanker is berthed at the jetty (DQ27.55; DM315, p. 18; DQ40.1;
DQ45.1).
♦ Opinion 17 — The Panel is of the opinion that the presence of the LNG terminal is
not likely to have a significant impact on the movements of non motorized crafts.
On another issue, the proponent made a commitment to develop extra trails that could
make use of the wooded area south of the terminal to improve the network of skiable
trails between Lévis and Beaumont, once construction is finished. The proponent also
made a commitment to develop, on both sides of Highway 132, passages that would
allow drivers of all-terrain vehicles and snowmobiles to safely cross the tunnel linking
the shore facilities to the terminal’s land facilities (PR3.3.1, p. 2.98-2.99; PR6, p. 200).
198 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure