22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Impacts on the natural environment<br />

zone borders a refuge pond located between the peat bog and the ruisseau Saint-<br />

Claude. During the construction period, drainage and backfilling work of 5.69 ha of the<br />

peat bog are planned to build a concealment berm. The proponent’s visual<br />

simulations show that building such a berm would moderately reduce the visual<br />

impact of the facilities for users of Highway 132, without entirely concealing the tanks<br />

from their view. Given the peat bog’s ecological value and the importance of this<br />

component of the natural environment from a sustainable development perspective,<br />

its conservation should be ensured (DA55.3; DQ58.4, p. 1 to 5).<br />

During terminal operation, pumping water drained by the tank basins could have an<br />

effect on peat bog drainage if a hydraulic link exists between the surface water and<br />

the groundwater body under the peat bog. However, this hydraulic connection<br />

remains to be confirmed by additional hydrogeological studies. Furthermore, Fisheries<br />

and Oceans Canada and the MRNF have voiced their concerns regarding the<br />

potential existence of a hydraulic link between the peat bog, the refuge pond and the<br />

ruisseau Saint-Claude. They also expressed concern regarding the potential<br />

consequences of the peat bog drainage on the flow rate of these streams and on fish<br />

habitat (DQ5.1, p. 6; DQ6.1, p. 4; DQ62.1).<br />

The proponent suggested some mitigation measures linked to the pumping of<br />

groundwater, such as the injection of bentonite along a trench to create a hydraulic<br />

barrier between the peat bog and the basin. He also suggested that pumped water be<br />

discharged towards the peat bog. As for the moist forest bordering the refuge pond, the<br />

proponent plans to maintain a minimum 20-m buffer zone during construction work.<br />

♦ Recommendation 22 — Noting the mitigation measures put forward by the<br />

proponent, the Panel recommends that the latter conduct additional geological studies<br />

in order to confirm the groundwater behaviour and the existence of potential links<br />

between the groundwater body, the peat bog located north-east of the site, the refuge<br />

pond and the ruisseau Saint-Claude.<br />

♦ Recommendation 23 — The Panel recommends that the peat bog be preserved from<br />

backfilling by removing the planned concealment berm from the project. The Panel<br />

also recommends that any residual loss be compensated, in compliance with the<br />

guidelines provided by the ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement<br />

et des Parcs, to authorize work on an ombrotrophic or minerotrophic peat bog.<br />

Pipeline route<br />

The area being studied for the pipeline route includes numerous wetlands, mainly<br />

natural peat bogs which occupy between 10% and 15% of this region’s surface area.<br />

In general, the different alternatives avoid wetlands or bypass them on the sidelines<br />

Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 211

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!