Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Opinions of participants<br />
transportation industry (Table de concertation de l’industrie métallurgique du Québec,<br />
DM346, p. 5; Mr. Denis Bernier, DM637, p. 5).<br />
Several participants believed that converting to natural gas would be desirable for<br />
users of fossil fuels which are more polluting, such as fuel oil 1 . In their view, the<br />
expected drop in natural gas prices resulting from this project would be a necessary<br />
incentive for this substitution. Some companies specified that they were planning to<br />
convert their facilities to natural gas (Fabrication PFL inc., DM207, p. 2; Cométal inc.,<br />
DM201, p. 4).<br />
Some participants were sceptical, however, regarding such a substitution in energy<br />
sources, and believed that no real demonstration supporting this theory had been<br />
made 2 . In this respect, the Conseil régional de l’environnement Chaudière-<br />
Appalaches believed that a market survey should be carried out to correctly assess<br />
this option (DM591, p. 21). Moreover, some feared that natural gas would also<br />
become a substitute for electricity, which would represent a more polluting choice in<br />
the Québec context (Ms. Suzanne Rochon, DM536, p. 4; Ms. Louise Crevier<br />
Letendre, DM317, p. 4; AQLPA, DM592.1, p. 38). The Amis de la vallée du Saint-<br />
Laurent suggested the following:<br />
The LNG terminal project at Lévis must only be authorized if the governments of<br />
Canada and Québec take measures against the substitution of natural gas which<br />
is imported for less polluting forms of energy where such forms are used, and that<br />
it not be used in new developments, unless it would be impossible to use energy<br />
savings or less polluting energy sources.<br />
(DM551, p. 10)<br />
Regarding health considerations, the <strong>Agence</strong>s de la santé et des services sociaux de<br />
la Chaudière-Appalaches and of the Capitale-Nationale believed that “choosing an<br />
energy approach which favours the use of fossil fuels is not an optimal choice for the<br />
public health, even if natural gas offers obvious advantages over other hydrocarbons<br />
such as fuel oil” (DM602, p. 15).<br />
1. Mr. Christian Jobin, DM8, p. 1; Centre local de développement Robert-Cliche, DM21, p. 2; Centre local de<br />
développement de Beauce-Sartigan, DM23, p. 5; Centre local de développement de Nouvelle-Beauce, DM42,<br />
p. 2; Mr. Marcelin Harvey, DM398; Mr. Raymond Miron and Ms. Francine Miron, DM409, p. 1 and 2; Mr. Émile<br />
Blais, DM406, p. 1; Ramp-Art inc., DM454, p. 2; Mr. Dominic Doré, DM475.1, p. 1; Mr. Normand Audet, DM480,<br />
p. 1; Mr. Alain Boucher, DM561, p. 1.<br />
2. Mr. Louis Maccabée, Regroupement national des conseils régionaux de l’environnement du Québec, DT29,<br />
p. 60; Ms. Yolande Lépine, DM66, p. 1; Centre de recherche et d’information en consommation, DM9, p. 1;<br />
Ms. Suzanne A. Samson, DM186, p. 1; Mr. Jean Dupont, DM301, p. 1; Ms. Sylvie Vincent and Mr. Daniel Bégin,<br />
DM314, p. 1.<br />
Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 21