22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Opinions of participants<br />

transportation industry (Table de concertation de l’industrie métallurgique du Québec,<br />

DM346, p. 5; Mr. Denis Bernier, DM637, p. 5).<br />

Several participants believed that converting to natural gas would be desirable for<br />

users of fossil fuels which are more polluting, such as fuel oil 1 . In their view, the<br />

expected drop in natural gas prices resulting from this project would be a necessary<br />

incentive for this substitution. Some companies specified that they were planning to<br />

convert their facilities to natural gas (Fabrication PFL inc., DM207, p. 2; Cométal inc.,<br />

DM201, p. 4).<br />

Some participants were sceptical, however, regarding such a substitution in energy<br />

sources, and believed that no real demonstration supporting this theory had been<br />

made 2 . In this respect, the Conseil régional de l’environnement Chaudière-<br />

Appalaches believed that a market survey should be carried out to correctly assess<br />

this option (DM591, p. 21). Moreover, some feared that natural gas would also<br />

become a substitute for electricity, which would represent a more polluting choice in<br />

the Québec context (Ms. Suzanne Rochon, DM536, p. 4; Ms. Louise Crevier<br />

Letendre, DM317, p. 4; AQLPA, DM592.1, p. 38). The Amis de la vallée du Saint-<br />

Laurent suggested the following:<br />

The LNG terminal project at Lévis must only be authorized if the governments of<br />

Canada and Québec take measures against the substitution of natural gas which<br />

is imported for less polluting forms of energy where such forms are used, and that<br />

it not be used in new developments, unless it would be impossible to use energy<br />

savings or less polluting energy sources.<br />

(DM551, p. 10)<br />

Regarding health considerations, the <strong>Agence</strong>s de la santé et des services sociaux de<br />

la Chaudière-Appalaches and of the Capitale-Nationale believed that “choosing an<br />

energy approach which favours the use of fossil fuels is not an optimal choice for the<br />

public health, even if natural gas offers obvious advantages over other hydrocarbons<br />

such as fuel oil” (DM602, p. 15).<br />

1. Mr. Christian Jobin, DM8, p. 1; Centre local de développement Robert-Cliche, DM21, p. 2; Centre local de<br />

développement de Beauce-Sartigan, DM23, p. 5; Centre local de développement de Nouvelle-Beauce, DM42,<br />

p. 2; Mr. Marcelin Harvey, DM398; Mr. Raymond Miron and Ms. Francine Miron, DM409, p. 1 and 2; Mr. Émile<br />

Blais, DM406, p. 1; Ramp-Art inc., DM454, p. 2; Mr. Dominic Doré, DM475.1, p. 1; Mr. Normand Audet, DM480,<br />

p. 1; Mr. Alain Boucher, DM561, p. 1.<br />

2. Mr. Louis Maccabée, Regroupement national des conseils régionaux de l’environnement du Québec, DT29,<br />

p. 60; Ms. Yolande Lépine, DM66, p. 1; Centre de recherche et d’information en consommation, DM9, p. 1;<br />

Ms. Suzanne A. Samson, DM186, p. 1; Mr. Jean Dupont, DM301, p. 1; Ms. Sylvie Vincent and Mr. Daniel Bégin,<br />

DM314, p. 1.<br />

Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!