22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Impacts on the natural environment<br />

historical site for instance. Therefore, this federal law does not apply to the lands<br />

covered by the project.<br />

In Quebec, the term ‘‘designated species’’ includes any species designated as<br />

‘‘threatened’’ or ‘‘vulnerable’’ under the Act respecting threatened or vulnerable<br />

species. A species is designated as threatened when it is in an extremely precarious<br />

situation, when the situation will permanently worsen if no initiative is taken to counter<br />

this precariousness and when its extinction is apprehended in a more or less short<br />

term. A vulnerable species is one whose survival is precarious even if its extinction is<br />

not apprehended. However, a regressive evolution of its population or the degradation<br />

of its habitats risks occurring if no measure is taken to ensure species survival 1 .<br />

The Act respecting threatened or vulnerable species guarantees complete protection<br />

to floristic species designated as threatened or vulnerable, by prohibiting among<br />

others the destruction of a specimen of theses species. According to the MDDEP, the<br />

presence of a few individuals of a threatened or vulnerable species would not suffice<br />

in itself to prohibit a project from taking place or to order its cessation. For instance,<br />

the law would allow displacing a population of such a species to avoid its destruction,<br />

taking into account the project’s impacts, the legal status of the plants targeted and<br />

their conservation value (DQ73.1, p. 2). However, one participant is opposed to such<br />

an action:<br />

A great number of conservation organizations are opposed to it as a<br />

compensation measure and consider that the preservation of an endangered<br />

species cannot be dissociated from that of its habitat […] The few studies that<br />

have evaluated the success rate of such a compensation measure reveal in fact<br />

more failures than successes […] The Advisory committee on threatened or<br />

vulnerable flora considers therefore that the relocation of a threatened<br />

species does not represent an acceptable compensation measure.<br />

(Ms. Gisèle Lamoureux, DT34, p. 59 and 60)<br />

The Act also seeks to protect the habitats of floristic species identified in the Act<br />

respecting threatened or vulnerable species [E-12.01, r.0.4], by prohibiting in particular<br />

any activity likely to modify the ecological processes specific to them. Here again<br />

exceptions are proposed, including for activities authorized by the Minister of<br />

Sustainable development, Environment and Parks or by the government (DQ73.1, p. 2).<br />

1. J. Labrecque and G. Lavoie, Les plantes vasculaires menacées ou vulnérables du Québec, ministère de<br />

l’Environnement, Direction du patrimoine écologique et du développement durable, Québec, p. 10-11.<br />

218 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!