22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Assessing the risks related to the project<br />

Closer to home, the terminal of Canaport in New Brunswick uses a 595-m radius<br />

around the LNG tanks. However, contrary to the current project which plans on using<br />

full containment tanks, the tanks of that terminal are single wall. The terminals in<br />

Freeport and Cameron in the United States have exclusion radiuses of 279 and<br />

283 m respectively around their full containment tanks (DA12, p. S11-4).<br />

Furthermore, the MDDEP was of the opinion that the proponent’s analysis of the<br />

exclusion zones was acceptable and in compliance with the CSA-Z276 standard<br />

(DQ61.1, p. 2). It also recalled that it could recommend, if required, additional security<br />

measures beyond those planned by the proponent, should the project be completed.<br />

♦ Finding — The Panel found that there are other facilities in the world of the same<br />

nature as those of the project, whose exclusion zones are of the same magnitude as<br />

those proposed in the project.<br />

The accident scenarios used and their consequences<br />

The proponent assessed the possible consequences from a collision between a ship<br />

and an LNG tanker located at the jetty. He retained four main scenarios for his land<br />

facilities. They included fires resulting from an LNG leak out of the largest ESD 1<br />

segment (PR3.3.2, F-1, p. 47); from tank lines; from the unloading line; and from a<br />

tank roof. The pipeline was the subject of a separate analysis<br />

The consequences of a collision between a ship and a berthed LNG<br />

tanker<br />

To assess the consequences stemming from the most likely accident scenarios for a<br />

collision between a ship and an LNG tanker at the jetty, the proponent used breaches<br />

of 250 mm, 750 mm and of 1,500 mm. The distances to the 5-kW/m 2 thermal radiation<br />

limit, as well as the dispersion distances, were the same as those provided in Table 7.<br />

Table 9 shows the number of residences in the Lévis-Beaumont sector which could<br />

possibly be included in the 5-kW/m 2 impact area, should these accident scenarios<br />

ever occur.<br />

1. ESD Segment: Emergency Shutdown System.<br />

Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!