Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Issues in dispute<br />
Territorial context of the project<br />
For the City of Lévis, the designation for industry and port activities around the Ville-<br />
Guay area bears witness to a long-standing desire to take advantage of a favourable<br />
situation, namely the potential for deep-water ships to dock at the farthest point<br />
upstream, coupled with large flat lands that suit large-scale industrial plants. Lévis<br />
considers that the proposed LNG terminal corresponds well to this type of use and<br />
that its city by-laws allow it to host the terminal, subject to two amendments, qualified<br />
as minor and that did not cause any controversy. Lévis will also have to modify some<br />
sections of its urban development regulations that cover the projected gas pipeline<br />
route. The city council mandated its planning department to prepare the required<br />
modifications (DM315, p. 13; DB27, p. 14).<br />
Some one hundred opponents to the project nonetheless applied to the Superior<br />
Court to have the project declared as not in compliance with the City of Lévis zoning<br />
by-law No. 234 (DC97). This application is based especially on the expertise of a city<br />
planner, for whom the uses authorized by the zoning by-law do not cover most of the<br />
LNG terminal components. He explained that these components were largely<br />
incompatible with many of the uses authorized since they involve health and public<br />
security risks (Mr. Claude Lavoie, DT17, p. 52 to 62; DC3).<br />
Moreover, under the authority of the Municipal Code of Québec (L.R.Q., c. C-27.1),<br />
the Municipality of Beaumont adopted by-law No. 523 on December 19, 2005,<br />
“Règlement relatif à l’entreposage de certaines matières explosives, inflammables ou<br />
autrement dangereuses” (DB14; DM619, p. 22). This by-law forbids, among other<br />
things, the storage of gaseous or liquid methane and liquefied natural gas on<br />
Beaumont land and within a radius of 1 km beyond Beaumont’s municipal limits.<br />
Since the land retained by the proponent is adjacent to the Beaumont municipal limits,<br />
the perimeter affected by by-law No. 523 encompasses the major part of the project<br />
site. According to the municipality of Beaumont, the proposed LNG terminal could not<br />
be operated without violating its by-law No. 523.<br />
However, this interpretation by Beaumont is rejected by the proponent and the City of<br />
Lévis. In addition, in an aim to counter the Beaumont by-law, on May 7, 2007, the<br />
Lévis city council adopted the by-law Règlement RV-2007-06-18 permettant<br />
l’emmagasinage and l’entreposage de certaines matières sur une partie du territoire 1 .<br />
This by-law aims specifically to allow the storage of the substances forbidden by bylaw<br />
523, and also asserts that the Beaumont by-law is not applicable on the territory<br />
of Lévis (DM619; DB62; DB111).<br />
1. It should be noted that this by-law was not in force when it was sent to the Panel<br />
Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 103