22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Opinions of participants<br />

cryogenics 1 . The proponent plans on setting up a Chair of Energy Efficiency and LNG<br />

Technologies Studies, and this piqued the interest of some. For them, developing this<br />

knowledge represents an important innovation and research opportunity. In this respect, a<br />

participant underscored its potential: “Consequently, the university community will be<br />

called upon to become involved. I think that the city of Québec region, and by<br />

extension the province of Québec, can position itself on the gas technology world<br />

stage, thanks to the potential of all our stakeholders” (Mr. Stéphane Côté, DM91,<br />

p. 2). For la Chambre de commerce de Lévis, “new applications on the transfer of<br />

“frigories” or cold unites for thermal conversion and cold-processing industries are<br />

concrete examples of the project’s contribution to innovation, scientific research and<br />

energy efficiency” (DM611, p. 7). The Conseil régional de l’environnement Chaudière-<br />

Appalaches was of the opinion that “to reach its goal of maximizing its contribution to<br />

sustainable development, this research chair should devote itself to developing and<br />

applying renewable and non-polluting energy sources” (DM591, p. 19).<br />

However, many had doubts 2 about the project’s real job creation benefits, and were of<br />

the opinion that these jobs will be scarce after the construction phase: “the proponent has<br />

promised that 70 permanent positions will be created thanks to this project. We don’t<br />

believe that this is worth the trouble it would cause the region. We will receive little in<br />

comparison to what the proponent has promised” (Mr. Gaston Fournier and<br />

Ms. Réjeanne Guay, DM148). The Conseil régional de l’environnement Chaudière-<br />

Appalaches also voiced some concerns in this respect: “If we make comparisons with<br />

other activity sectors, we can note that the $850 million of proposed investments by<br />

the proponent could generate a significantly higher number of jobs, over a muchlonger<br />

time span” (DM591, p. 4). Some were of the opinion that the community should<br />

commit to finding ways to increase the project’s benefits and the jobs created during<br />

the operating phase (Mr. Renald Plourde, DM218, p. 4; Mr. Clément Lapointe,<br />

DM509, p. 2).<br />

Revenues for the City of Lévis and the governments<br />

The Pôle Québec–Chaudière-Appalaches, the Chambre de commerce de Lévis and<br />

the Chambre de commerce de Québec emphasized the importance of “the property<br />

tax revenues for the City of Lévis, which will total $7 million, government tax revenues<br />

for Québec which will total $71 million, and government tax revenues for Canada<br />

which will total $31 million” (Mr. Gaston Déry, DT15, p. 56). In this respect, a<br />

1. Mr. Claude Vien, DM388, p. 1; Mr. Gaston Godbout, DM395, p. 2; Vaperma, DM446, p. 2; Mr. Normand Lebrun,<br />

DM73, p. 2; Mr. Daniel Bastien, DM75, p. 2; Mr. Jacques Pouliot, DM80, p. 2; Mr. Pierre Hébert, DM538, p. 1;<br />

Mr. Conrad Marceau, DM472, p. 1; Mr. Claude Brochu, DM514, p. 1; Usinacom, DM451, p. 1.<br />

2. Ms. Suzanne Rochon, DM536, p. 3; Conseil central de Québec–Chaudière-Appalaches, DM120, p. 4;<br />

Mr. Philippe de le Rue, DM423, p. 5; Quebec Green Party, DM571, p. 4; Ms. Colette Fortin, DM50, p. 1;<br />

Mr. Jean-Claude Florence, DM193, p. 8; Mr. Jacques Clermont, DM224, p. 9; Mr. Jean-Guy Allard, DT15, p. 37.<br />

Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 43

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!