Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Opinions of participants<br />
cryogenics 1 . The proponent plans on setting up a Chair of Energy Efficiency and LNG<br />
Technologies Studies, and this piqued the interest of some. For them, developing this<br />
knowledge represents an important innovation and research opportunity. In this respect, a<br />
participant underscored its potential: “Consequently, the university community will be<br />
called upon to become involved. I think that the city of Québec region, and by<br />
extension the province of Québec, can position itself on the gas technology world<br />
stage, thanks to the potential of all our stakeholders” (Mr. Stéphane Côté, DM91,<br />
p. 2). For la Chambre de commerce de Lévis, “new applications on the transfer of<br />
“frigories” or cold unites for thermal conversion and cold-processing industries are<br />
concrete examples of the project’s contribution to innovation, scientific research and<br />
energy efficiency” (DM611, p. 7). The Conseil régional de l’environnement Chaudière-<br />
Appalaches was of the opinion that “to reach its goal of maximizing its contribution to<br />
sustainable development, this research chair should devote itself to developing and<br />
applying renewable and non-polluting energy sources” (DM591, p. 19).<br />
However, many had doubts 2 about the project’s real job creation benefits, and were of<br />
the opinion that these jobs will be scarce after the construction phase: “the proponent has<br />
promised that 70 permanent positions will be created thanks to this project. We don’t<br />
believe that this is worth the trouble it would cause the region. We will receive little in<br />
comparison to what the proponent has promised” (Mr. Gaston Fournier and<br />
Ms. Réjeanne Guay, DM148). The Conseil régional de l’environnement Chaudière-<br />
Appalaches also voiced some concerns in this respect: “If we make comparisons with<br />
other activity sectors, we can note that the $850 million of proposed investments by<br />
the proponent could generate a significantly higher number of jobs, over a muchlonger<br />
time span” (DM591, p. 4). Some were of the opinion that the community should<br />
commit to finding ways to increase the project’s benefits and the jobs created during<br />
the operating phase (Mr. Renald Plourde, DM218, p. 4; Mr. Clément Lapointe,<br />
DM509, p. 2).<br />
Revenues for the City of Lévis and the governments<br />
The Pôle Québec–Chaudière-Appalaches, the Chambre de commerce de Lévis and<br />
the Chambre de commerce de Québec emphasized the importance of “the property<br />
tax revenues for the City of Lévis, which will total $7 million, government tax revenues<br />
for Québec which will total $71 million, and government tax revenues for Canada<br />
which will total $31 million” (Mr. Gaston Déry, DT15, p. 56). In this respect, a<br />
1. Mr. Claude Vien, DM388, p. 1; Mr. Gaston Godbout, DM395, p. 2; Vaperma, DM446, p. 2; Mr. Normand Lebrun,<br />
DM73, p. 2; Mr. Daniel Bastien, DM75, p. 2; Mr. Jacques Pouliot, DM80, p. 2; Mr. Pierre Hébert, DM538, p. 1;<br />
Mr. Conrad Marceau, DM472, p. 1; Mr. Claude Brochu, DM514, p. 1; Usinacom, DM451, p. 1.<br />
2. Ms. Suzanne Rochon, DM536, p. 3; Conseil central de Québec–Chaudière-Appalaches, DM120, p. 4;<br />
Mr. Philippe de le Rue, DM423, p. 5; Quebec Green Party, DM571, p. 4; Ms. Colette Fortin, DM50, p. 1;<br />
Mr. Jean-Claude Florence, DM193, p. 8; Mr. Jacques Clermont, DM224, p. 9; Mr. Jean-Guy Allard, DT15, p. 37.<br />
Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 43