22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Assessing the risks related to the project<br />

Since an LNG tanker would navigate at some 500 m from île d’Orléans, the closest<br />

distance to the shore on its route before arriving at the terminal, a natural gas cloud<br />

could theoretically reach certain inhabited areas of the island if the LNG pool would<br />

not immediately ignite after a spill. Also, the Panel notes that, with an LNG tanker<br />

approaching the planned jetty, a vapour cloud could also reach the shoreline<br />

population in certain places in the sector of Lévis-Beaumont, when using breaches of<br />

750 mm and 1,500 mm, assuming a steady-state spill pool and without immediate<br />

ignition. In this respect, the proponent stated that such a cloud would spread at<br />

relatively low altitude. Should this cloud reach an ignition source, it would ignite and<br />

the fire would travel back in the direction of the LNG tanker. Under these<br />

circumstances the thermal impact would only be serious for someone within the cloud<br />

(Mr. Glenn Kelly, DT3, p. 70 and 75).<br />

Environment Canada also reported that it couldn’t perform the modelling of an<br />

accident generating a natural gas cloud which would spread towards the shores of île<br />

d’Orléans. However, the Department was of the opinion that the risk was low and that<br />

there are chances the cloud would disperse before reaching the shore and would not<br />

ignite, depending on wind direction, its force and the possible presence of an ignition<br />

source. In the event of a terrorist act or a collision, there would be an ignition source<br />

with the resulting quick ignition of gas vapours and therefore, a gas cloud would not<br />

spread (Mr. Robert Reiss, DQ75.1)<br />

The CERL was also of the opinion that it was very unlikely a natural gas cloud would<br />

separate from its source and travel over a distance that would be greater than the one<br />

calculated by the proponent (DQ78.1).<br />

♦ Finding — The Panel found that sensitive community elements could be exposed to<br />

thermal radiation which could reach 5 kW/m 2 in the sectors of the east point of île<br />

d’Orléans, of Saint-Laurent-de-L’Île-d’Orléans and of Lévis-Beaumont, when<br />

considering collision or grounding scenarios, and using a steady-state spill pool and a<br />

1,500 mm breach in an LNG tanker tank as modelling criteria.<br />

♦ Finding — The Panel found that in the event of a collision or a grounding of an LNG<br />

tanker, a liquefied natural gas vapour cloud could reach certain locations with<br />

shoreline populations for île d’Orléans and for Lévis-Beaumont. However, the<br />

probability of such an occurrence is low.<br />

140 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!