Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Opinions of participants<br />
tankers was underestimated by the proponent (Mr. Sébastien Blouin, DM424, p. 14).<br />
The Municipality of Saint-Jean-de-L’Île-d’Orléans expressed its concerns regarding<br />
the planned waiting area for LNG tankers close to the island: “since LNG tankers<br />
carry hazardous material, the municipality is preoccupied by the fact that this area is<br />
located less than 900m from residences on the banks” (DM149, p. 1 and 2).<br />
One participant also believed that a security perimeter should be planned around the<br />
LNG tankers as their danger area moves with them, and they therefore become a risk<br />
for populations on the banks (Mr. Denis Latrémouille, DM462, p. 2). Moreover, even if<br />
he considered these tankers as well-built and properly maintained, “the other ships<br />
that sail in the seaway, and with whom they will have to coexist, won’t be inspected”<br />
(ibid., p. 57). Another participant recommended that “every person involved in<br />
operations related to these types of ships and facilities have the opportunity to benefit<br />
from relevant training […]. We must make sure that these people are sufficiently<br />
prepared and equipped to deal with emergencies before the first tankers berth at the<br />
terminal” (Mr. Mathieu Vachon, DM499, p. 1).<br />
However, several participants believed that limited risks are part and parcel of<br />
maritime transport. In this respect, the Québec Port Authority was of the opinion that a<br />
safe coexistence is possible among the various types of navigation occurring in the<br />
area (DM552, p. 16 and 17). The Canadian Maritime Union stated that the LNG<br />
tankers are “known to be the safest and most reliable ships in the global fleet” (DM20,<br />
p. 1). The Société de développement économique du Saint-Laurent emphasized that<br />
the maritime approach has security advantages over other transportation methods as<br />
it has recorded lower accidents and spills rates than rail and road transportation<br />
(DM381, p. 5).<br />
The Comité des utilisateurs du port de Québec stated that most factors which can<br />
influence navigation conditions are known in advance and “perfectly managed by river<br />
navigation specialists which are involved in the management of marine traffic close to<br />
the city of Québec” (DM281, p. 2). Moreover, some emphasized that the legal<br />
framework, the procedures and the security measures that frame maritime traffic are<br />
strict (Ms. Julie Côté, DM139; <strong>Agence</strong>s océaniques du Bas-Saint-Laurent ltée,<br />
DM185; The Shipping Federation of Canada, DM442, p. 2). Others added that<br />
maritime piloting and escorting LNG tankers with pilots who know the river’s<br />
characteristics are excellent ways to reduce navigation-related risks in the area<br />
(Mr. Jean-Marc Boisvert, DM136, p. 2; Mr. Michel Pouliot, DM298, p. 5 and 6;<br />
Corporation des pilotes du Bas-Saint-Laurent, DM544, p. 10 and 11).<br />
Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 51