22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Impacts on the inhabited area and human activities<br />

PM2.5; and two stations in urban residential districts, Saint-Charles-Garnier (O3 and<br />

PM2,5) and De l’Église (TPM). Two other stations were included: one in a forest<br />

setting, Notre-Dame-du-Rosaire (TSP, PM2.5 and O3); and the other in an agricultural<br />

area, Saint-François-de-L’Île-d’Orléans (O3).<br />

♦ Finding — The Panel notes that the current air quality in the proposed project<br />

development area has not been caracterized. Rather, it was estimated using data<br />

gathered at monitoring stations operated by the ministère du Développement durable,<br />

de l’Environnement et des Parcs in the city of Québec and surrounding areas.<br />

Project impact on air quality<br />

The proponent simulated by computer the project’s contribution to concentrations of<br />

contaminants in the air using atmospheric dispersion models recognized by the<br />

MDDEP. These models integrate data relevant to the characteristics of emission<br />

sources, meteorological data, traffic movements, and the characteristics of receptors,<br />

i.e. points on the ground where the concentration of pollutants is calculated using<br />

computerized mathematical models. The main goal of the simulations is to predict that<br />

concentrations of pollutants emitted by one or several new sources will not exceed<br />

standards, if the project is completed.<br />

Construction phase<br />

The proponent identified the main sources for emission of airborne pollutants on the<br />

construction site and around it during the anticipated two years of construction, i.e.<br />

2007 and 2008. The proponent retained the following sources: exhaust gases from<br />

vehicles and machinery, dust rose by transportation traffic on the roads, whether<br />

paved or not, the handling of backfill material and excavation by blasting for land<br />

facilities and the utility corridor leading to the jetty; and, finally, cement mixing plants<br />

on the construction site itself.<br />

According to the impact statement, the results obtained are based on the assumption<br />

that construction site machinery will run continually at full capacity during the life of<br />

the construction site , and that the maximum number of vehicles going to the site on<br />

an access road via Lallemand Road will be attained every day. As a precautionary<br />

measure, the modelling are based on the highest reference thresholds and take into<br />

account meteorological conditions most unfavourable to the atmospheric dispersion of<br />

pollutants. The projected maximum concentrations in the ambient air, if the<br />

construction of the proposed facilities proceeds, are presented in Table 13. The<br />

computer model data for the home closest to the construction site show that<br />

cumulation of maximum concentrations of pollutants during construction and<br />

contaminants in the air (baseline) would respect the RQA and the PRAA standards.<br />

188 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!