22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The regulatory framework<br />

Impacts on the inhabited area and human activities<br />

The project’s impact on air quality is assessed by taking the concentration of a<br />

pollutant that is present in the environment referred to here as “baseline”. The<br />

maximum cumulative concentration for each contaminant in a given location is<br />

obtained by adding the anticipated contribution from construction site activities or<br />

terminal operation to the present level.<br />

The proponent’s impact statement compared the predicted concentrations during<br />

construction and operation of the LNG Terminal to the standards set by Quebec’s<br />

existing Regulation respecting the Quality of Atmosphere (RQA) [Q-2, r. 20] and Draft<br />

Air Quality Regulation (PRAA), published November 16, 2005 in the Gazette officielle<br />

du Québec but which still has not been enacted by the government.<br />

The federal government submitted a bill, entitled Canada’s Clean Air Act, to set national<br />

objectives for air pollutants and greenhouse gases to reduce risks to health and the<br />

environment (DB37). In regard to human health, a document from Health Canada and<br />

Environment Canada, published in 1998 and entitled National Ambient Air Quality<br />

Objectives for Particulate Matter recommends 25 µg/m³ for PM10 and 15 µg/m³ for PM2.5<br />

on average over a 24-hour period (DB60, p. 22). However in 2000, the Canadian<br />

Council of Ministers of the Environment (CCME) set a maximum pan-Canadian<br />

standard for PM2.5 of 30 µg/m³ in ambient air (maximum over 24 hours). This value was<br />

set as an interim benchmark by the MDDEP and subsequently as a standard by the<br />

PRAA 1 .<br />

Current air quality<br />

In Quebec, a network of air quality monitoring stations allows the MDDEP to oversee<br />

air quality in certain regions. It must be noted, however, that there are no such<br />

stations in the area of the proposed LNG terminal or even in the city of Lévis. To<br />

make up for this absence of data, the proponent, in consultation with the MDDEP<br />

picked monitoring stations in the existing network judged to be representative of the<br />

area where the project will be built.<br />

In order to establish the best baseline for the Lévis area for all the contaminants<br />

referred to in the impact statement, the proponent used data gathered from the<br />

closest monitoring stations located in urban, rural, and industrial settings. Three<br />

stations were chosen in the city of Québec: the Des Sables station, located in the<br />

urban and industrial areas of the Limoilou district, which measures SO2, NO2, CO and<br />

1. Ministère du Développement durable, de l’Environnement et des Parcs, Critères de qualité de l’air, fiches<br />

synthèses [On-line (January 22, 2007): www.mddep.gouv.qc.ca/air/criteres/fiches.pdf].<br />

Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure 187

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!