22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Impacts on the inhabited area and human activities<br />

♦ Finding — The Panel notes the measures planned by the proponent aimed at<br />

reducing air contaminants that could be emitted on a temporary basis by the LNG<br />

terminal construction site, including development of access to the construction site<br />

via Lallemand Road.<br />

Operation phase<br />

Operation of the LNG terminal is likely to result in the emission of pollutants resulting<br />

from the use of natural gas in the burners of the LNG vaporizers. There also could be<br />

other less significant or intermittent emission sources such as diesel firewater pumps<br />

and emergency generators, the flare stack and fugitive natural gas emissions. Adding<br />

to this would be the occasional presence of an LNG tanker (one day out of six),<br />

mainly at the time of its unloading, and of tugs needed for berthing or setting off. The<br />

project’s expected air emissions are listed in Table 14.<br />

Table 14 Expected air emissions from operation of the LNG terminal and<br />

the jetty with LNG tankers and tugs<br />

Sources Carbon<br />

monoxi<br />

de (CO)<br />

Nitrogen<br />

oxides((N<br />

Ox)<br />

Total<br />

particulate<br />

matter<br />

(TPM)<br />

Fine<br />

particula<br />

tes<br />

(PM2,5)<br />

Sulphur<br />

dioxide<br />

(SO2)<br />

Volatile<br />

organic<br />

compounds<br />

(VOCs)<br />

LNG vaporizers (t/yr) 90 66 3.8 3.8 3.4 5.4<br />

Flare (t/yr) 19.8 3.6 0 0 0.17 0<br />

Fire pumps (t/yr) 0.15 0.69 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.05<br />

Emergency generators (t/tr) 0.44 2.04 0.16 0.13 0.03 0.16<br />

LNG tankers and tugs (t/yr) 21 106 2.7 2.1 63 2.7<br />

Total (t/yr.) 131 179 6.6 6.1 67 8.3<br />

Source: adapted from PR5.1, Appendix H, and Table H.6.<br />

Table 15 shows modeled maximum concentrations of contaminants outside the<br />

project’s property limits during jetty and land facility operation. On examining the<br />

results in the table, the Panel notes that the anticipated addition of air emissions from<br />

terminal operation would result in values well below RQA and PRAA standards,<br />

except for the maximum sulphur dioxide content of 275 µg/m³. This value would come<br />

close to the ambient air quality standard on an hourly basis set at 276 µg/m³ in the<br />

PRAA. Such a situation could arise among Ville-Guay sector homes built on the cliff<br />

along Highway 132, near the jetty.<br />

190 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!