Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Impacts on the inhabited area and human activities<br />
♦ Finding — The Panel notes the measures planned by the proponent aimed at<br />
reducing air contaminants that could be emitted on a temporary basis by the LNG<br />
terminal construction site, including development of access to the construction site<br />
via Lallemand Road.<br />
Operation phase<br />
Operation of the LNG terminal is likely to result in the emission of pollutants resulting<br />
from the use of natural gas in the burners of the LNG vaporizers. There also could be<br />
other less significant or intermittent emission sources such as diesel firewater pumps<br />
and emergency generators, the flare stack and fugitive natural gas emissions. Adding<br />
to this would be the occasional presence of an LNG tanker (one day out of six),<br />
mainly at the time of its unloading, and of tugs needed for berthing or setting off. The<br />
project’s expected air emissions are listed in Table 14.<br />
Table 14 Expected air emissions from operation of the LNG terminal and<br />
the jetty with LNG tankers and tugs<br />
Sources Carbon<br />
monoxi<br />
de (CO)<br />
Nitrogen<br />
oxides((N<br />
Ox)<br />
Total<br />
particulate<br />
matter<br />
(TPM)<br />
Fine<br />
particula<br />
tes<br />
(PM2,5)<br />
Sulphur<br />
dioxide<br />
(SO2)<br />
Volatile<br />
organic<br />
compounds<br />
(VOCs)<br />
LNG vaporizers (t/yr) 90 66 3.8 3.8 3.4 5.4<br />
Flare (t/yr) 19.8 3.6 0 0 0.17 0<br />
Fire pumps (t/yr) 0.15 0.69 0.05 0.04 0.01 0.05<br />
Emergency generators (t/tr) 0.44 2.04 0.16 0.13 0.03 0.16<br />
LNG tankers and tugs (t/yr) 21 106 2.7 2.1 63 2.7<br />
Total (t/yr.) 131 179 6.6 6.1 67 8.3<br />
Source: adapted from PR5.1, Appendix H, and Table H.6.<br />
Table 15 shows modeled maximum concentrations of contaminants outside the<br />
project’s property limits during jetty and land facility operation. On examining the<br />
results in the table, the Panel notes that the anticipated addition of air emissions from<br />
terminal operation would result in values well below RQA and PRAA standards,<br />
except for the maximum sulphur dioxide content of 275 µg/m³. This value would come<br />
close to the ambient air quality standard on an hourly basis set at 276 µg/m³ in the<br />
PRAA. Such a situation could arise among Ville-Guay sector homes built on the cliff<br />
along Highway 132, near the jetty.<br />
190 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure