22.08.2013 Views

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Impacts on the inhabited area and human activities<br />

In order to mitigate the increase in noise and vibrations on Highway 132, on Lallemand<br />

Road, and rue de l’Anse early on, the proponent had thought of building a temporary<br />

access road to the site from Expressway 20. Following the agreement reached between<br />

the proponent and the City of Lévis in July 2006, the City planned to build an access road<br />

to the proposed facilities from Lallemand Road, and the option of access to the<br />

construction site from Expressway 20 was abandoned. The proponent took the view that<br />

this new access would eliminate almost all of the construction-related traffic on<br />

Highway 132 and Lallemand Road, except for the part of Lallemand Road located<br />

between Expressway 20 and the new access road (PR3.1, p. 4.20; PR5.2.1, p. 3-3).<br />

In regard to pile driving, this would go on for three years, which, according to Health<br />

Canada, is too long to be considered temporary. Each one of the 350 piles would<br />

require average driving of an hour and drilling lasting from one to 10 hours. According<br />

to the proponent’s timetable, three barges would carry out the work simultaneously<br />

from May to December 2007, from April to December 2008, and from April to August<br />

2009. Work would be carried out from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. five days a week and, in<br />

exceptional circumstances, until 10 p.m.<br />

It is anticipated that MDDEP criteria will be exceeded during the day in four locations:<br />

three on rue de Vitré and one at 950, Domaine des Pêches. In this regard, the<br />

Directors of Public Health for de la Chaudière-Appalaches and de la Capitale-<br />

Nationale expressed their concern that noise generated during the project<br />

construction phase could negatively affect the quality of life and, potentially, the health<br />

of persons living in the neighbouring residential district through sleep disruption, for<br />

example. (PR3.3.1, p. 6.96-6.97; DM602, p. 77-78 and Appendix 2).<br />

Among other things, the proponent plans to install anti-noise protection around motors<br />

to mitigate noise impacts and limit, to the extent possible, those activities generating<br />

the most noise to the period between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. and also plans recourse to<br />

noise-abatement walls as needed, in keeping with Health Canada’s suggestion.<br />

Trucks would be equipped with variable pitch back-up alarms to limit noise at night<br />

without harming worksite safety. A follow-up program is also planned to sample sound<br />

at 11 measuring stations to make sure that the MDDEP noise criteria are respected.<br />

Finally, the proponent plans financial compensation for residents who must move<br />

away temporarily because noise levels are exceeded during construction.<br />

♦ Finding — The Panel finds that the project construction phase could cause the noise<br />

criteria, on the basis of Leq 1 h, set by the ministère du Développement durable, de<br />

l’Environnement et des Parcs to be exceeded, a situation that could last for three<br />

years. The Panel takes note that the proponent proposes financial compensation for<br />

temporary moves by residents who might be affected by noise levels that exceed<br />

these criteria during the construction phase.<br />

184 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!