Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Report - Agence canadienne d'évaluation environnementale
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Territorial context of the project<br />
It is not the Panel’s responsibility to settle this dispute between the two municipal<br />
administrations. This dispute will nonetheless have to be resolved in the case where the<br />
project is authorized. As for the dispute regarding the project’s compliance with the<br />
Lévis by-laws, it will be up to the courts to settle the matter, and not the Panel. This<br />
being said, the Panel notes that these litigious issues bear witness to the opposition to<br />
the project among the citizens living near the sector proposed for the project.<br />
♦ Finding — The Panel found that the City of Lévis considers that the project respects<br />
its land use planning and development by-laws, except for two modifications that it<br />
qualifies as minor. The Panel notes however those citizens in Lévis and Beaumont<br />
who live near the project site have taken legal action before the Superior Court to<br />
declare the project not in conformance with Lévis’ zoning by-law.<br />
♦ Finding — The Panel noted a dispute between the Municipality of Beaumont and the<br />
City of Lévis regarding application of Beaumont by-law 523 prohibiting storage of<br />
gaseous or liquid methane and liquefied natural gas in Beaumont and within a 1-km<br />
radius beyond that land, which encompasses the sector in Lévis proposed for the<br />
project.<br />
Evolution of the land use framework<br />
In its analysis, the Panel took into account the process of preparing and revising the<br />
legal instruments which govern land use and development. This process was referred<br />
to by both those who support the project and those who oppose it. The former submit<br />
that the industrial and port vocation of the Ville-Guay sector was planned a long time<br />
ago. The latter consider that, since industrial and port projects have not yet been<br />
developed, Ville-Guay should be dedicated only to its existing uses.<br />
In 1994 the former MRC of Desjardins had undertaken the revision of the 1987<br />
development plan. A revised plan was proposed and adopted as a by-law on<br />
November 28, 2001. However, since it never received ministerial approval, that<br />
revised plan was never applied. After the January 2002 merger, the new City of Lévis<br />
started the revision process again. Despite a proposal dated December 23, 2004, the<br />
second revision process was interrupted in fall 2005 (DB61, p. v; DQ32.1; DC86.1,<br />
p. 13).<br />
With the Act to amend various legislative provisions concerning municipal affairs (S.Q.<br />
2006, c. 60, s. 131 and 132; DB94.2), Lévis is now obliged to adopt a plan for its<br />
entire territory by June 14, 2007 at the latest. In order to comply with this obligation,<br />
on February 7, 2007, Lévis adopted a second proposed land use and development<br />
plan, which it must submit to public consultations (DB105).<br />
104 Rabaska Project – Implementation of an LNG Terminal and Related Infrastructure