05.10.2013 Views

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Third, we have the moment that unites the unity of the relation and the plurality of the<br />

various properties. Hegel expresses this moment with the word “also.”<br />

These three moments describe moments, not things. If we treat the moments as<br />

things, the problem becomes insoluble. So we shouldn’t construe the problem as a matter<br />

of grounding the properties in a substance, where the properties and the substance are<br />

treated as distinct things that most somehow be brought into relation. Instead, we should<br />

consider the three moments as moments, as ways that the thing appears or exists, or, in<br />

subjective or epistemological terms, as ways we can consider the object. We can<br />

consider the object as many (various properties). We can consider it as a single thing<br />

(relation). Finally, in the third moment, we must grasp the sense in which it is the same<br />

thing that is both one (relation) and many (various properties). This is the problem of the<br />

unity of identity and difference, the basic problem of philosophy. It is also the basic<br />

problem all things must overcome in order to constitute themselves as things.<br />

In this passage Hegel also presents what he sees as the fundamental impediment<br />

to philosophy, as the prejudice or presupposition that prevents us from grasping the unity<br />

of identity and difference. This presupposition construes all identity as tautological<br />

relation of a thing to itself, and it construes all unity as either (a) a characteristic that a<br />

thing has as itself – in it self-identical relation to itself, or (b) as the mere togetherness of<br />

external aggregation, conjunction, or composition. So for every thing, it is true that A =<br />

A, and for all other things, for all not-As, A ≠ not-A. A is identical with itself and<br />

different from all other things. This is the “mere identity” that excludes difference. With<br />

this conception of identity, Hegel argues, only two conceptions of unity are possible.<br />

First, we can conceive unity as a defining characteristic of the thing considered merely as<br />

96

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!