05.10.2013 Views

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

or merely framed by us.” Instead, he describes the notion as “the very heart of things,” as<br />

that which “makes them what they are.” Likewise, he says: “To form a notion of an<br />

object means therefore to become aware of its notion.” So the term “notion” does not<br />

merely designate a mental concept or a process of thought, but rather it designates a<br />

conceptual structure in the object itself, a structure that constitutes the object as an object<br />

and that also determines its specific nature.<br />

All genuine objects instantiate the basic structures of the notion. In the passage<br />

just quoted, Hegel presents the notion in terms of the development of a plant. The<br />

teleological or purposive development of the plant presents an example of the basic<br />

structure that constitute the notion, a structure that Hegel describes in terms of the<br />

relation between universal and particular. However, the term “notion” designates the<br />

structures of objects that are both more basic and more complex than plants. 42 In the<br />

Encyclopedia, the term “notion” designates the structure of all genuine objects, including<br />

the objects of physics, chemistry, biology, anthropology, psychology, and politics. For<br />

instance, in the discussion of mechanics in the Science of Nature, the second volume of<br />

42 See Beiser’s Hegel, Chapter Four. Among other things, Beiser does a nice job of showing how<br />

the organic view of the universe ultimately rests upon a teleological or “living” view of matter, one that can<br />

be traced back to Leibniz. He also shows how the failure of purely mechanistic accounts of gravity and the<br />

development of chemistry, with phenomena like magnetism and electricity, contributed to the plausibility<br />

of this view. Beiser says: “According to the organic conception, the essence of matter consists not in dead<br />

extension but in power or force, which expresses itself as motion. It is the very essence of these forces to<br />

act or to realize themselves [emphasis added]” (p. 86). The basic structures of self-realization – i.e. the<br />

structures that manifest themselves in more developed forms in the structure of the will that grounds<br />

Hegel’s political philosophy – already exist at the level of matter. The various claims in this chapter about<br />

the priority of action over the thing that acts can be understood in terms of this conception of matter, a<br />

conception that explains matter or the thing in terms of force. Matter doesn’t simply possess force. It isn’t,<br />

on this view, an extended something that also possesses various attractive forces, but rather the extended<br />

something that is matter derives from more basic forces. Forces ground or constitute matter. In other<br />

words, actions ground or constitute the object. For a more general discussion on Naturphilosophie, one that<br />

focuses on Schelling, see also Beiser’s German Idealism: The Struggle against Subjectivism (pp. 506 –<br />

550).<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!