05.10.2013 Views

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

of the notion more generally. For the moment, though, it is sufficient to note the<br />

terminological similarities between Hegel’s discussion of the “I” and his discussion of the<br />

will in the “Introduction” to the Philosophy of Right.<br />

Hegel describes the moments of the “I” in terms of the same dichotomies that<br />

characterize the will. The first moment of the “I” consists in an “abstraction from all<br />

determinateness and content.” Thus like the first moment of the will, the first moment of<br />

the “I” is indeterminate and without content. Hegel goes on to describe the second<br />

moment of the “I” as “absolutely determined.” Like the second moment of the will, this<br />

moment of the “I” is determinate. Here we see the structure of the “I,” which is also the<br />

structure of the notion, described in terms of the distinction between indeterminacy and<br />

determinacy. Hegel also describes the “I” in terms of the distinction between the<br />

universal and the individual. While the first moment presents the “I” in its universality,<br />

the second moment presents the “I” in its individuality. 57<br />

In the final sentence of this passage Hegel says that the unity of these two<br />

moments, “constitutes the nature of the I as well as of the notion.” The structures of the<br />

“I” and the structures of the notion are the same. Stated differently, the “I” presents the<br />

highest instantiation of the notion. Hegel also makes a complex point about the unity of<br />

the first two moments of the “I.” He warns that we cannot comprehend the nature of the<br />

“I” unless we grasp its moments “in their abstraction” and “in their perfect unity” at “the<br />

same time.” This warning highlights a complex problem, one that receives a great deal of<br />

attention in the chapters that follow. The problem arises from the fact that the moments<br />

57 Here we see a slight difference between Hegel’s characterization of the “I” and his<br />

characterization of the will. Hegel describes the first and second moment of the will in terms of<br />

universality and particularity, and he describes the unity of these two moments as individuality. Here,<br />

Hegel describes the first two moments of the “I” in terms of universality and individuality.<br />

39

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!