05.10.2013 Views

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

THE UNITY OF IDENTITY AND DIFFERENCE AS THE ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

there must be some sense in which it is the same object that is both one and many. Hegel<br />

develops his account of the notion as a solution to this problem. In his account of the<br />

notion, Hegel shows how the object exists as the essential unity of its unity and plurality.<br />

As we will see, Hegel’s account of the notion closely follows the account of thought<br />

presented in Sections 5.4 and 5.5 of Chapter Three. Like thought, the object itself<br />

consists in a kind of circular or hermeneutic action, and like thought, the object consists<br />

in action that is self-determined.<br />

Hegel presents his resolution to this problem in the following passage, where he<br />

describes the structure of the notion. He says:<br />

Further, the living Substance is being which is in truth Subject, or, what is the<br />

same, is in truth actual only in so far as it is the movement of positing itself, or is<br />

the mediation of its self-othering with itself. This Substance is, as Subject, pure,<br />

simple negativity, and is for this very reason the bifurcation of the simple; it is the<br />

doubling which sets up opposition, and then again the negation of this indifferent<br />

diversity and of its anti-thesis [the immediate simplicity]. Only this self-restoring<br />

sameness, or this reflection in otherness within itself – not an original or<br />

immediate unity as such – is the True. It is the process of its own becoming, the<br />

circle that presupposes its end as its goal, having its end also as its beginning; and<br />

only by being worked out to its end, is it actual. 176<br />

The relation between this passage and our current problem may not be immediately<br />

obvious. Before examining the specific terms of this passage in an attempt to unpack its<br />

meaning and demonstrate its relation to our present concerns, there are two relatively<br />

obvious points we should note. First, this passage describes the structure of the “living<br />

Substance…which is in truth Subject,” or the “Substance…as Subject.” It presents an<br />

account of substance in terms of categories normally associated with human subjectivity.<br />

In Chapter One we saw that Hegel also uses the term “notion” to designate this<br />

176 Phenomenology of Spirit, p. 10.<br />

175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!