05.11.2013 Views

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Religion <strong>and</strong> Trade<br />

mer chants ranked immediately after Brita<strong>in</strong> <strong>and</strong> the Dutch Republic<br />

<strong>in</strong> the Archangel trade throughout the seventeenth <strong>and</strong> eighteenth<br />

centuries, it is not unlikely that the route Archangel–Amsterdam was<br />

<strong>in</strong>troduced as a result of the van der Smissens’ relations with Men -<br />

nonite merchants <strong>in</strong> Amsterdam. Dutch trade with Russian Arch -<br />

angel was almost exclusively <strong>in</strong> the h<strong>and</strong>s of Amsterdam’s Men non -<br />

ite <strong>and</strong> Lutheran merchants. 69<br />

From the start, bus<strong>in</strong>ess relations with the ports on the Frisian <strong>and</strong><br />

Dutch North Sea coast, such as Emden, Harl<strong>in</strong>gen, Hoorn, Amster -<br />

dam, <strong>and</strong> Rotterdam, underst<strong>and</strong>ably played a significant part. In the<br />

diary Jacob Gysbert van der Smissen kept while travell<strong>in</strong>g with his<br />

cous<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> 1766–8, he recorded everyone he met, everyone with whom<br />

he had a cup of tea (mostly women), smoked a pipe (only men), <strong>and</strong><br />

shared a glass of w<strong>in</strong>e. In fact, the two cous<strong>in</strong>s spent most of their<br />

time network<strong>in</strong>g. They saw people whom Jacob Gysbert had met on<br />

previous trips; relatives or friends functioned as <strong>in</strong>termediaries generat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

new contacts; they paid visits to their fathers’ <strong>and</strong> gr<strong>and</strong>fathers’<br />

old friends (<strong>and</strong> bus<strong>in</strong>ess partners); <strong>and</strong> they were <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

to friends of friends. These people can be grouped <strong>in</strong>to three cat -<br />

egories: relatives (mostly referred to as neef or nigt); Mennonites (un -<br />

less referred to by their position as a m<strong>in</strong>ister, deacon, or elder, they<br />

were given the attribute vr<strong>in</strong>d, ‘friend’, or respectfully ‘a god-fear<strong>in</strong>g<br />

person’); <strong>and</strong> trade agents (correspondenten). These relations displayed<br />

a great deal of stability. In Almelo the two cous<strong>in</strong>s met<br />

Johannes ten Caten <strong>and</strong> on this occasion it was remembered that their<br />

gr<strong>and</strong>father, H<strong>in</strong>rich I van der Smissen had stayed with ten Caten’s<br />

gr<strong>and</strong>father some fifty years before. 70<br />

Throughout the eighteenth <strong>and</strong> early n<strong>in</strong>eteenth centuries Lon -<br />

don was among the most important merchant cities <strong>in</strong> the van der<br />

Smissen network. It is not known exactly when bus<strong>in</strong>ess relations<br />

with English partners were established, but this might be connected<br />

with the fact that Jacobus van der Smissen, a member of the Am ster -<br />

edn. Altona, 1835; 2nd edn. Hamburg, 2006), esp. 356–8. From 1780 to 1806<br />

Eschels was capta<strong>in</strong> of the van der Smissens’ ship Henricus de Vierde.<br />

69 J. M. Welcker, ‘Het dagelijks brood: De doopsgez<strong>in</strong>den, de economie en de<br />

demografie’, <strong>in</strong> Groenveld, Jacopszoon, <strong>and</strong> Verheus (eds.), Wederdopers,<br />

Menisten, 195–218, esp. 207–8.<br />

70 ‘Reisetagebuch Jacob Gysbert van der Smissen’, 4 May 1766, cf. 6–7 May<br />

1766.<br />

241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!