05.11.2013 Views

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MONIKA POETTINGER<br />

Personal ties between former employer <strong>and</strong> employees, those of<br />

Ober kampf like those of Kramer, Grossmann, <strong>and</strong> Hartmann, merged<br />

<strong>in</strong>to <strong>in</strong>ternational networks of technological knowledge, an evolution<br />

of the Verlagssystem that became a unique source of <strong>in</strong>novation <strong>and</strong><br />

capital diffusion <strong>in</strong> n<strong>in</strong>eteenth-century Europe. The faith implicit <strong>in</strong><br />

these ties rema<strong>in</strong>ed b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g over time, often generated <strong>in</strong>ternational<br />

capital <strong>in</strong>vestments, spread <strong>in</strong>novation, <strong>and</strong> always decreased the<br />

impact of competition at times of economic uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty. Techno -<br />

logical networks, then, like merchant networks, were a source of<br />

social capital. Both were equally important <strong>in</strong> trigger<strong>in</strong>g entrepreneurial<br />

migrations <strong>and</strong> foster<strong>in</strong>g the mobility of productive factors.<br />

Through the operation of all these networks, the European economy<br />

acquired the capacity to adapt to sudden <strong>and</strong> unforeseeable <strong>in</strong>stitutional<br />

<strong>and</strong> political changes with a high degree of flexibility. Not only<br />

were trade routes shifted, new mercantile hubs created, <strong>and</strong> new<br />

markets opened, but production facilities were delocalized, factors of<br />

production moved, <strong>and</strong> technologies perfected <strong>and</strong> diffused. The<br />

grow<strong>in</strong>g economic activity <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation on the Cont<strong>in</strong>ent between<br />

the eighteenth <strong>and</strong> the n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century was ma<strong>in</strong>ly due to these<br />

‘entrepreneurial networks’.<br />

Education, Science, <strong>and</strong> Technological Innovation<br />

Adam Kramer’s response to uncerta<strong>in</strong>ty was network<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>novation,<br />

a trait common to all those technicians who, <strong>in</strong> the secular<br />

process of European <strong>in</strong>dustrialization, left their countries of orig<strong>in</strong> to<br />

migrate to other locations <strong>and</strong> set up their own manufactories.<br />

Technical knowledge was equally precious to governments <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> -<br />

vest ors, <strong>and</strong> formed the personal capital upon which these young<br />

men built their fortunes. A love of science <strong>and</strong> a keen eye for its<br />

<strong>in</strong>dustrial use were thus a legacy which men like Adam Kramer left<br />

to the younger generation. A scientific education soon became an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dispensable tool, along with the traditional commercial apprenticeship,<br />

<strong>in</strong> shap<strong>in</strong>g merchants <strong>and</strong> manufacturers. School<strong>in</strong>g had to<br />

adjust to this new perceived need. Innovation was thus transferred<br />

from manufactur<strong>in</strong>g to the education sector, which was still largely<br />

under religious control.<br />

Giulio Mylius <strong>and</strong> Antonio Kramer both attended the Privat-<br />

280

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!