05.11.2013 Views

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

MARK CASSON<br />

Efficiency of communication is <strong>in</strong>creased if different meet<strong>in</strong>gs<br />

take place at the same central place, so that people can attend several<br />

meet<strong>in</strong>gs on the same trip. Different meet<strong>in</strong>gs of <strong>in</strong>terest to the<br />

same groups of people can be scheduled to run <strong>in</strong> sequence, as with<br />

the annual conferences of related professional associations.<br />

Other meet<strong>in</strong>gs are <strong>in</strong> cont<strong>in</strong>uous operation. A shopp<strong>in</strong>g centre,<br />

for example, may be construed as a cont<strong>in</strong>uous open meet<strong>in</strong>g where<br />

people can come <strong>and</strong> go as they please. People who are attend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

scheduled meet<strong>in</strong>gs can ‘pop out to the shops’ at their convenience.<br />

Retail<strong>in</strong>g is a prom<strong>in</strong>ent activity at many of the hubs where people<br />

meet. Historically, abbeys <strong>and</strong> castles attracted retailers, especially<br />

on sa<strong>in</strong>ts’ days, while many of today’s major retail centres orig<strong>in</strong>ally<br />

developed around ports or centres of government.<br />

2. Emergence of Personal Transport Hubs through Economies of Agglomer ation<br />

Retail<strong>in</strong>g affords economies of agglomeration to consumers. Where<br />

different retailers stock different types of product, the consumer can<br />

collect an entire ‘basket’ of different goods on a s<strong>in</strong>gle trip. Where different<br />

retailers stock different varieties of the same product, the customer<br />

can assess the design <strong>and</strong> quality of different varieties on the<br />

spot. Where different retailers stock the same product, customers can<br />

compare prices. In each case the agglomeration of retailers reduces<br />

the marg<strong>in</strong>al cost of a customer’s search.<br />

Retailers supply<strong>in</strong>g complementary goods have a direct <strong>in</strong>centive<br />

to locate close together. If one shop is already sell<strong>in</strong>g outerwear, for<br />

example, then a shop that sets up next door sell<strong>in</strong>g underwear can<br />

anticipate a substantial ‘pass<strong>in</strong>g trade’. It is not so clear, though, why<br />

compet<strong>in</strong>g retailers would locate together. One reason is that customers<br />

refuse to buy from a local monopolist because they believe<br />

that they will be cheated. This reflects a lack of trust <strong>in</strong> society. Thus<br />

retailers who locate together ga<strong>in</strong> credibility: they acquire a small<br />

share of a large market <strong>in</strong>stead of the entire share of the very small<br />

market that they would otherwise enjoy.<br />

Another explanation relates to <strong>in</strong>novation. An effective way to<br />

advertise a new product is to display it adjacent to its closest competitor.<br />

Customers can be ‘<strong>in</strong>tercepted’ on their way to their usual<br />

source of supply. The ‘market test’ may well put one of the suppliers<br />

42

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!