05.11.2013 Views

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CAROLYN DOWNS<br />

as the year ended, Eccleston wrote ‘f<strong>in</strong>’ on the f<strong>in</strong>al page of his letter<br />

book without know<strong>in</strong>g the fate of his many friends <strong>in</strong> the West<br />

Indies.<br />

Conclusion<br />

The network society is a concept that is often thought of as hav<strong>in</strong>g<br />

emerged with the widespread use of the Internet as a means of dissem<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />

<strong>in</strong>formation <strong>and</strong> email as a mode of communication.<br />

However, Eccleston <strong>and</strong> his contemporaries were themselves part of<br />

an extremely complex network society. The speed of modern communication<br />

has perhaps bl<strong>in</strong>ded historians to the very real networks<br />

that were the lifeblood of trade <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong> the evolv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>dustrial<br />

society of the late eighteenth century <strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong>deed, also allowed<br />

the spread of radical ideas. While twenty-first century globalization<br />

has effectively produced networks that are often not susta<strong>in</strong>able, the<br />

commercial networks of Eccleston’s period were nurtured <strong>and</strong> nourished<br />

over long periods, provid<strong>in</strong>g the stability <strong>and</strong> security that fostered<br />

cont<strong>in</strong>ued commercial growth. 98 The role of trust as a glue that<br />

held networks together <strong>in</strong> an ‘economy of regard’ is an additional<br />

element that is perhaps less important <strong>in</strong> the contract-bound <strong>and</strong> litigious<br />

twenty-first century. But for merchants <strong>in</strong> the late eighteenth<br />

century it was a vital adjunct to the <strong>in</strong>formation provided by the networks<br />

to which an <strong>in</strong>dividual belonged. 99<br />

There is a temptation to look at networks, such as those developed<br />

<strong>and</strong> utilized by Eccleston, as <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g risk aversion. However, risk<br />

aversion would not have led to the rapid developments <strong>in</strong> trade <strong>and</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>dustry that generated <strong>in</strong>dustrial growth <strong>and</strong> social change <strong>in</strong><br />

Engl<strong>and</strong> dur<strong>in</strong>g the late eighteenth century on a scale unprecedented<br />

<strong>in</strong> world history. Eccleston’s networks were designed for risk m<strong>in</strong>imization,<br />

built on long-term relationships, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>tended to engender<br />

confidence <strong>and</strong> trust <strong>in</strong> an age when governments provided little<br />

98 e.g. the expansion of the Far Eastern electronics <strong>in</strong>dustry <strong>in</strong>to Europe <strong>in</strong> the<br />

last decade of the twentieth century went <strong>in</strong>to rapid reverse once the sector<br />

began to contract with the slow-down of the American economy at the end<br />

of 1999.<br />

99 Pearson <strong>and</strong> Richardson, ‘Bus<strong>in</strong>ess Network<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the Industrial Revo lu -<br />

tion’, 673.<br />

376

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!