05.11.2013 Views

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

Cosmopolitan Networks in Commerce and Society 1660–1914

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MARK CASSON<br />

III. Basic Concepts of Network Theory<br />

1. Connectivity <strong>and</strong> Configuration<br />

The basic pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of network representation are set out <strong>in</strong> the<br />

mathematical theory of graphs. 8 The def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g feature of a network is<br />

connection. A set of elements which are connected to each other form a<br />

network. Every pair of elements belong<strong>in</strong>g to a network is connected<br />

up, either directly or <strong>in</strong>directly. Indirect connections are effected<br />

through other elements of the network.<br />

From an economic <strong>and</strong> social perspective, there are four key<br />

aspects of networks:<br />

● size, as measured by the number of elements that belong to the<br />

network;<br />

● diversity, as measured by the number of different types of element<br />

that belong to the network;<br />

● the types of relationship that connect the members; <strong>and</strong><br />

● the configuration of the network, which describes the pattern <strong>in</strong><br />

which the different elements are connected up.<br />

Economic historians have discussed relationships <strong>in</strong> considerable<br />

detail, but have said surpris<strong>in</strong>gly little about size <strong>and</strong> diversity, that<br />

is, about the characteristics of the elements that are connected up.<br />

Configuration has been studied even less by historians, <strong>and</strong> it is<br />

therefore useful to beg<strong>in</strong> by address<strong>in</strong>g this issue.<br />

Considerable research has been carried out <strong>in</strong>to the configurations<br />

of physical networks, but remarkably little <strong>in</strong>to the configuration<br />

of social networks. 9 Conversely, far more research has been carried<br />

out <strong>in</strong>to the nature of relationships <strong>in</strong> social networks than <strong>in</strong><br />

8 See Norman L. Biggs, E. Keith Lloyd, <strong>and</strong> Robert Wilson, Graph Theory,<br />

1736–1936 (Oxford, 1986); <strong>and</strong> Re<strong>in</strong>hard Diestel, Graph Theory (New York,<br />

1997).<br />

9 There are some notable exceptions, however. These <strong>in</strong>clude Patrick Direian<br />

<strong>and</strong> Frans N. Stockman, Evolution of Social <strong>Networks</strong> (Amsterdam, 1997);<br />

S. Wasserman <strong>and</strong> K. Faust, Social Network Analysis: Methods <strong>and</strong> Applications<br />

(Cambridge, 1994); <strong>and</strong> Barry Wellman <strong>and</strong> S. D. Berkovitz (eds.) Social<br />

Structures: A Network Approach (Cambridge, 1988).<br />

28

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!