09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

al. (1968) found no tumors in lifetime benzidine feeding study, but poor survival also limits the study’s<br />

value.<br />

Zabezhinski (1970) exposed 48 albino rats (male and female numbers not specified) to 10-20 mg/m 3<br />

benzidine aerosol for 4 hours/day, 5 days/week for 20 months. Among animals surviving at 13 months,<br />

5/28 developed leukemia (0/21 untreated; p =0.052)<br />

Tumors have also been observed in animals injected subcutaneously with benzidine. They include<br />

hepatocellular carcinomas, Zymbal gland tumors and injection-site tumors (Spitz et al., 1950; Bonser et<br />

al, 1956; Pliss, 1964; Prokofjeva, 1971). Intraperitoneal injection of benzidine resulted in the induction<br />

of mammary tumors in a single study (Morton et al, 1981).<br />

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

The data presented by Zavon et al. (1973) are the only human cancer data appropriate for the<br />

development of a cancer potency value for benzidine. The US EPA (1986, 1987, 1988), Allen et al.<br />

(1987), and CDHS (1988) have each provided estimates of cancer potency based on human data.<br />

However, different assumptions made in the calculation of exposure levels has resulted in different<br />

estimates of the cancer potency. Potencies derived in these studies assume that cancer risk is<br />

proportional to cumulative exposure. Previously, IARC (1982) had suggested that benzidine cancer<br />

risk be based on the assumption that the empirical distribution of cumulative incidence rate is a function<br />

of the duration of continual exposure. Derivations of cancer potencies from the human data using these<br />

different methodologies and exposure assessments are described in the Methodology section below.<br />

Cancer potency values have also been derived from animal studies, in particular those of Griswold et al.<br />

(1968), Miakawa and Yoshida (1975), Saffioti et al (1967), and Littlefield et al. (1984). Resulting<br />

potency estimates were well below those derived from the human data, suggesting humans may be more<br />

sensitive to the carcinogenic effects of benzidine, and therefore animal data are not appropriate for use<br />

in the establishing a cancer potency value. CDHS has based its benzidine cancer potency value on the<br />

human data of Zavon et al. (1973) using exposure level assessment modifications of Allen et al. (1987)<br />

and the methodology of US EPA (1986, 1987, 1988).<br />

Methodology<br />

US EPA (1986, 1987, 1988) made exposure estimates from the Zavon et al. study (1973) based upon<br />

reported mean urinary concentrations of 0.04 mg/l. Assuming that average body weight is 70 kg,<br />

average urinary output is 1.2 l/day, and 1.45% of absorbed benzidine is excreted in the urine, US EPA<br />

calculated the average daily dose to be 0.047 mg/kg-day. Adjusting this value for work time exposure,<br />

with 11.46 years the average time exposed, 56.5 years the average age of the cohort, and 240 work<br />

days per year, final lifetime exposure levels were calculated to be 0.0063 mg/kg-day.<br />

94

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!