09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Methodology<br />

Dosage estimates of NDPA from the Cardy et al. (1979) study were made based on reference body<br />

weights of 0.380 and 0.229 kg and daily food consumption rates of 0.030 and 0.021 kg for male and<br />

female mice, respectively. The resulting daily dosage calculations are 79 and 92 mg/kg-day for males<br />

and females, respectively, for the groups fed 1000 ppm in their diet, and 316 and 368 mg/kg-day for<br />

males and females, respectively, for the groups fed 4000 ppm in their diet. Fitting a multistage<br />

procedure to the incidence data for transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder gives upper 95%<br />

confidence bounds on the cancer potency (q 1 * ) of 0.00050 and 0.00048 (mg/kg-day) -1 for male and<br />

female rats, respectively (Crump and Howe (1984)).<br />

Calculation of the cancer potency for animals (q animal ) can be made using q *<br />

1 and the following<br />

relationship, where T is the natural lifespan of the animal (104 weeks) and T e is the experimental<br />

duration (100 weeks):<br />

q animal = q * 1 × (T/T e ) 3<br />

The resulting q animal values of 0.00056 and 0.00050 (mg/kg-day) -1 for male and female rats,<br />

respectively, can be converted to human cancer potency values (q human ) based on the following<br />

relationship, where bw animal is the assumed body weight for the test species and bw human is the assumed<br />

human body weight (reference values from US EPA (1986)):<br />

q human = q animal × (bw h /bw a ) 1/3<br />

The resulting estimates of q human are 0.0032 and 0.0034 (mg/kg-day) -1 .<br />

Daily dosage estimates for animals from the Innes et al.(1969) study were made with estimates of food<br />

consumption rates of 12% and 13% for male and female mice, respectively, based on Gold et al.<br />

(1984). During the oral gavage dosing period (days 7 to 28) it is assumed that a linear threefold<br />

increase in body weight occurs. The method of Crouch (1983) was used to account for variable dosing<br />

during the study period. Calculations of daily dosage are 444 and 476 mg/kg-day for male and female<br />

mice, respectively. Fitting the linear model below to the significant tumor incidence data for hepatomas<br />

in male B6C3F 1 mice results in a cancer potency estimate (q animal ) of 0.0046 (mg/kg-day) -1 . In this<br />

relationship, D is the estimated daily dose, p(T e ) is the probability of dying with a tumor at time T e , and<br />

A is the background (control) tumor incidence.<br />

q =<br />

animal<br />

-ln[1- p(T<br />

e )] - A<br />

D<br />

Conversion of the q animal to q human is achieved as described for the Cardy et al. (1979) data, with an<br />

assumed experimental animal body weight (bw animal ) of 0.03 kg. The resulting q human for this study is<br />

0.061 (mg/kg-day) -1 .<br />

Selection of a reference cancer potency value comes from identification of the most sensitive site,<br />

410

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!