09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

y inhalation is similar for rats and humans and if the standard assumption that an average adult human<br />

has a body weight of 70 kg and an average air intake of 20 m 3 per day is used, an oral intake of 1<br />

mg/kg/day lead is equivalent to an inhalation exposure of 3,500 µg/m 3 for 24 hr. Using the latter units,<br />

the 95% UCL for q 1<br />

equals 2.4 × 10 -6 (µg/m 3 ) -1 , which assumes equivalent absorption by the 2 routes.<br />

If there is approximately 5 times higher absorption by the respiratory tract compared to the<br />

gastrointestinal tract (Owen, 1990), the inhalation risk can be multiplied by 5 and the corrected<br />

inhalation unit risk is 1.2 × 10 -5 (µg/m 3 ) -1 .<br />

To derive a range of risks, the study by Koller et al. (1985), which showed the greatest sensitivity to<br />

lead’s carcinogenicity, was selected. In that study, 13 out of 16 male rats drinking water containing<br />

2600 ppm lead acetate developed renal tumors, compared to 0 of 10 in controls. The resulting human<br />

equivalent dose (HED) was calculated as 60.1 mg/kg-day. Using the GLOBAL86 program, an MLE<br />

for q 1<br />

of 0.0279 (mg/kg-day) -1 and a 95% UCL, q 1<br />

* of 0.0455 (mg/kg-day) -1 were obtained. The<br />

latter potency was divided by 3500 to obtain a preliminary inhalation unit risk of 1.3 × 10 -5 (µg/m 3 ) -1 ,<br />

which, when corrected for the 5-fold greater absorption by inhalation compared to ingestion in humans<br />

(Owen 1990), yielded a final inhalation unit risk of 6.5 × 10 -5 (µg/m 3 ) -1 .<br />

Therefore, the 95% UCL obtained for the range of inhalation unit risks is 1.2 × 10 -5 (µg/m 3 ) -1 to 6.5 ×<br />

10 -5 (µg/m 3 ) -1 . The best value of the cancer unit risk for air was selected as 1.2 × 10 -5 per µg/m 3 .<br />

Table 2:<br />

Lead in food (ppm)<br />

Kidney tumors in rats fed lead a<br />

Animal dose<br />

(mg/kg-day)<br />

HED b<br />

(mg/kg-day)<br />

Added Measured exp d tumors<br />

Number of rats c % % died<br />

0 3 0.225 0.038 20 f 0 0 50<br />

0 5 0.39 0.067 100 0 0 37<br />

10 18 1.40 0.238 50 0 0 36<br />

50 62 4.78 0.818 50 0 0 36<br />

100 141 10.88 1.86 50 0 0 36<br />

500 548 42.27 7.22 50 5 10 52<br />

1000 e 1130 79.65 13.6 20 f 10 50 50<br />

2000 e 2102 162 27.2 20 f 16 80 80<br />

a Data from Azar et al. (1973).<br />

b Human Equivalent Dose = daily dose × (70/0.35) 1/3 .<br />

c Among similar size groups of female rats, kidney tumors were seen only in 7 of 20 animals in the 2000 ppm group.<br />

d Number of animals exposed to indicated level of lead in food.<br />

e The rate of body weight gain was depressed in both groups. Since mortality was not increased in the 1000 ppm<br />

group, it can be considered a Maximally Tolerated Dose (MTD).<br />

f The groups with only 20 rats per dose level were also studied for 2 years but were begun several months after the<br />

other dose groups.<br />

338

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!