09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Male or female C57Bl/6 mice (50/sex/group) were exposed to 60 or 240 ppm NDBA in their drinking<br />

water from age 10-12 weeks until moribund or dead (Bertram and Craig, 1970). The incidence of<br />

bladder carcinomas in males was 17/47 and 36/45 at the 60 and 240 ppm concentrations, respectively.<br />

Females developed bladder carcinomas with an incidence of 2/42 and 8/45 for the 60 and 240 ppm<br />

groups, respectively. Esophageal papillomas were found in 45/47 and 40/42 for males and 40/42 and<br />

45/45 for females at the 60 and 240 ppm groups, respectively. No data on unexposed controls were<br />

presented.<br />

Male and female Syrian Golden Hamsters (5/sex/group) were given single doses of 400, 800, or 1600<br />

mg/kg NDBA by gavage; groups of 20 males or females served as controls (Althoff et al., 1973).<br />

Animals were observed for their lifespan and were killed when moribund. Mean survival times were<br />

affected in a dose-dependent manner; controls survived 63.5 weeks, and low-, medium- and high-dose<br />

groups survived for 59.6, 54.5, and 49.3 weeks, respectively. Respiratory neoplasms (unspecified<br />

type) were found in 0/40, 3/10, 5/10 and 7/10 hamsters of the control, low-, medium-, and high-dose<br />

groups, respectively. In a later study, Althoff et al. (1974) exposed groups of 20 (10/sex/group) male<br />

and female Syrian Golden hamsters to 0, 29, 58, 116, 232, or 464 mg/kg NDBA once pre week for<br />

life. In this study, the incidences of respiratory neoplasms were 0/20, 0/20, 0/19, 2/16, 12/20, and<br />

8/16 for the groups exposed to 0, 29, 58, 116, 232, or 464 mg/kg NDBA, respectively.<br />

Several studies in mice, rabbits and hamsters have shown NDBA to be carcinogenic following<br />

subcutaneous injection (Fuji et al., 1977; Flaks et al., 1973; Althoff et al., 1973 & 1974; Reznik et<br />

al., 1976; Cohen et al., 1975).<br />

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

The study by Bertram and Craig (1970) was used by CDHS (1988) to derive the cancer potency for<br />

NDBA. The upper bound estimate of cancer potency from these data is the most reliable upper bound<br />

from dose-response data in sensitive species.<br />

The upper 95% bound on the multistage polynomial could not be determined from the tumor incidence<br />

data in two other studies: Althoff et al. (1974) and Okajima et al. (1971). The potency estimates from<br />

the studies by Lijinsky and Reuber (1983), and Takayama and Imaizumi (1971) both rely on<br />

assumptions about the time of sacrifice and corrections for less than lifetime dosing.<br />

Methodology<br />

The study by Bertram and Craig (1970) showed that several organ sites developed tumors in both<br />

sexes of mice exposed to NDBA. The combined incidence of bladder and esophageal neoplasms in<br />

male mice was used for the potency estimate. These data depict the most reliable dose-response for<br />

the most sensitive site and species.<br />

387

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!