09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

male and female rats. Tumor incidences were 0/10, 2/26 and 15/26 in pooled control, low-dose and<br />

high-dose male rats, respectively, and 0/10, 2/26 and 6/26 in pooled control, low-dose and high-dose<br />

female rats, respectively.<br />

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

The results of several studies are listed in Gold et al. (1984). Innes et al. (1969) administered ethylene<br />

thiourea (ETU) to small groups of both sexes of B6C3F 1 and B6AKF 1 mice; Graham et al. (1973,<br />

1975) performed relatively large multiple dose studies in Charles River CD rats of both sexes;<br />

Weisburger et al. (1981) and Ulland et al. (1972) conducted moderately sized studies in male and<br />

female Charles River CD rats. Because all male B6C3F 1 and female B6AKF 1 mice treated with ETU<br />

developed liver tumors, an upper bound estimate on potency could not be determined for these studies.<br />

The lower bound estimates of cancer potency derived from the mouse data are consistent with<br />

potencies derived from the studies in rats. Further, cancer potencies derived from the rat studies are<br />

consistent with one another. The value selected is derived from the highest quality study, Graham<br />

(1973, 1975), which had a large sample size and used multiple dose groups. The target site chosen for<br />

the analysis was the thyroid in the Charles River CD rats, the most sensitive site (see Table 2)<br />

(Cal/EPA, 1992).<br />

Methodology<br />

Expedited Proposition 65 methodology (with cross-route extrapolation) was used to derive a cancer<br />

potency factor. A unit risk factor was then calculated by <strong>OEHHA</strong>/ATES from the cancer potency<br />

factor using a reference human body weight of 70 kg and an inspiration rate of 20 m 3 /day.<br />

V. REFERENCES<br />

Bionetics Research Labs, I. 1968. Evaluation of Carcinogenic, Teratogenic and Mutagenic Activities of<br />

Selected Pesticides and Industrial Chemicals. Volume I. Carcinogenic study. Prepared for National<br />

Cancer Institute. NTIS Publication No. PB-223 159.<br />

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) 1992. Expedited Cancer Potency Values and<br />

Proposed Regulatory Levels for Certain Proposition 65 Carcinogens. Office of Environmental Health<br />

Hazard Assessment, Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, Berkeley, CA.<br />

Gold L, Sawyer C, Magaw R, Backman G, de Veciana M, Levinson R, Hooper N, Havender W,<br />

Bernstein L, Peto R, Pike M and Ames B. 1984. A Carcinogenic Potency Database of the<br />

standardized results of animal bioassays. Environ Health Perspect 58:9-319.<br />

Graham SL, Davis KJ, Hansen WH and Graham CH. 1975. Effects of prolonged ethylene thiourea<br />

ingestion on the thyroid of the rat. Food Cosmet Toxicol 13:493-499.<br />

308

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!