09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ASBESTOS<br />

CAS No: 1332-21-4<br />

I. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES (From HSDB (1998) except as noted)<br />

Molecular weight<br />

not applicable<br />

Boiling point<br />

decomposes<br />

Melting point decomposes at 600ºC (NIOSH, 1994)<br />

Vapor pressure<br />

not applicable<br />

Air concentration conversion not applicable<br />

II.<br />

HEALTH ASSESSMENT VALUES<br />

Unit Risk Factor: 6.3 E-2 (µg/m 3 ) -1 [1.9 E-4 (100 PCM fibers/m 3 ) -1 ; see Appendix D]<br />

Slope Factor: 2.2 E+2 (mg/kg-day) -1<br />

[Human occupational asbestos lung tumor and mesothelioma incidence data, excess relative risk<br />

model (CDHS, 1986).]<br />

III.<br />

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS<br />

Human Studies<br />

Asbestos has been consistently demonstrated to be carcinogenic in humans and is recognized as a<br />

human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, 1977; NRC, 1984;<br />

Ontario Royal Commission, 1984). In occupational cohort mortality studies, exposure to the three<br />

principal commercial forms of asbestos – chrysotile, amosite, and crocidolite – has been repeatedly<br />

linked with increased risks for lung cancer, mesothelioma and, to a lesser extent, other neoplasm,<br />

particularly gastrointestinal and laryngeal cancer (IARC, 1977; NRC, 1984). Occupational exposure to<br />

anthophyllite has been associated with an increased risk for lung cancer. Cigarette smoking acts<br />

synergistically with occupational exposure to asbestos in increasing the risk of lung cancer, but not<br />

mesothelioma (Hammond et al., 1979; NRC, 1974).<br />

Tremolite and actinolite are often contaminants of other ores and have not been extensively studied with<br />

respect to their biological effects in humans.<br />

The epidemiologic studies on asbestos are extensive. These have been reviewed by the Consumer<br />

Product Safety Commission (1983), the National Academy of Sciences (NRC, 1984), Nicholson<br />

(1985), and the Ontario Royal Commission (1984). The relevant studies used in deriving the cancer<br />

risk for asbestos are summarized in the tables below.<br />

73

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!