09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

To confirm these findings, Ericksson et al. (1981) replicated this study in Southern Sweden, using cases<br />

from a cancer registry. Similar study methods were used, including matching controls from a population<br />

registry (at a 2:1 ratio), and determining exposure by mail and telephone questionnaires. The<br />

investigators calculated separate odds ratios for exposure to phenoxy acids known to be contaminated<br />

with PCDD and PCDF (OR-17.0; 95% CI 2.1-140.0) and for exposure to phenoxy acids thought to<br />

be free of PCDD and PCDF (OR-4.2; 95% CI 1.2-14.9). When exposure was dichotomized into<br />

categories of 30 days or less, or more than 30 days, the ORs were 5.7 and 8.5, respectively, possibly<br />

indicating a dose-response trend.<br />

One of the drawbacks of this study is that, exposure histories were provided by the study subjects;<br />

therefore, the results may be influenced by recall bias. Cases (or their next of kin) may be more likely to<br />

recall an exposure than a healthy person. In order to investigate this possible bias, Hardell (1981)<br />

duplicated the study methods using cases of colon cancer. Here there was no significant association<br />

with exposure to herbicides. Therefore, Hardell concluded that the association with STS was not due<br />

to reporting differences between diseased cases and healthy controls.<br />

Smith et al. (1984) reported a similar case/control study in New Zealand. Here, male cases of STS<br />

were gathered from a national cancer registry, with controls also being selected from the same registry.<br />

This method of control selection was designed to avoid differential recall. Unlike the Swedish studies,<br />

however, the New Zealand study showed no significant associations with reported phenoxy herbicide<br />

spraying. The authors suggested that if dioxin were the necessary agent, that Swedish herbicides may<br />

have been more contaminated than New Zealand herbicides. However, Smith et al. (1984) note that<br />

the Swedish investigators also found a significant association between STS and<br />

non-dioxin-contaminated herbicides, indicating that if the association were true, dioxin would not be the<br />

sole agent.<br />

Another case/control study reported in brief by Olsen and Jensen (1984) of cases from the Danish<br />

Cancer Registry failed to show an association between nasal cancer and chlorophenol exposure,<br />

although nasal cancer was associated with occupational exposure to wood dust.<br />

In a letter to Lancet, Milham (1982) reported proportionate mortality data from Washington state<br />

indicating that farmers suffered a significantly larger proportion of deaths due to STS. No other group<br />

occupationally exposed (foresters, orchardists, tree farmers) showed an excess of STS; however, the<br />

exposure assessment was based on occupations taken from death certificates. Furthermore, Milham<br />

indicated that 2,4-D was the predominant herbicide used, and 2,4-D is not generally contaminated with<br />

2,3,7,8-TCDD.<br />

A cohort study of phenoxy acid herbicide applicators in Finland was reported by Riihimaki et al.<br />

(1983). A historical cohort of 1926 herbicide applicators was assembled from the records of four large<br />

employers, including the Finnish Highway Authority and State Railways. These male workers had used<br />

chlorinated phenoxyacids for at least two weeks between 1955 and 1971. Their mortality between<br />

1972 and 1980 was studied by comparing their names against population registers. National mortality<br />

figures provided expected age-standardized numbers of deaths. Deaths from all causes, and for all<br />

169

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!