09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 2 (continued).<br />

Cupferron-induced hemangiosarcoma incidence in male and female F344 rats<br />

and B6C3F 1 mice (NCI, 1978)<br />

1. Doses as reported by Gold et al. (1984).<br />

2. Tumor incidences as reported by Gold et al. (1984)<br />

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

Results of the NCI (1978) feeding study in male and female B6C3F 1 mice and Fischer 344 rats are<br />

listed in Gold et al. (1984). Benign and malignant vascular tumors as well as tumors at other sites were<br />

observed in mice and rats of both sexes treated with cupferron. Cancer potency is based on the data<br />

for vascular tumors in the male rat (see Table 2) because the rat is the more sensitive of the species<br />

tested, and the male appears to be slightly more sensitive than the female (Cal/EPA, 1992).<br />

Methodology<br />

Expedited Proposition 65 methodology (with cross-route extrapolation) was used to derive a cancer<br />

potency factor. Analysis of the data set using the computer program TOX_RISK (Crump et al., 1991)<br />

indicated that inclusion of the high dose group resulted in a p-value of = 0.05 based on the chi-square<br />

goodness-of-fit test, indicating non-linearity. Following procedures described by US EPA (Anderson<br />

et al., 1983), the high dose group was excluded from the analysis to correct for the poor fit (Cal/EPA,<br />

1992). A unit risk factor was then calculated by <strong>OEHHA</strong>/ATES from the cancer potency factor using a<br />

reference human body weight of 70 kg and an inspiration rate of 20 m 3 /day.<br />

V. REFERENCES<br />

Anderson, EL and the Carcinogen Assessment Group of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency<br />

1983. Quantitative approaches in use to assess cancer risk. Risk Anal 3:277-295.<br />

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) 1992. Expedited Cancer Potency Values and<br />

Proposed Regulatory Levels for Certain Proposition 65 Carcinogens. Office of Environmental Health<br />

Hazard Assessment, Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, Berkeley, CA.<br />

Crump KS, Howe RB, Van Landingham C and Fuller WG. 1991. TOXRISK Version 3. TOXicology<br />

RISK Assessment Program. KS Crump Division, Clement International Division, 1201 Gaines Street,<br />

Ruston LA 71270.<br />

Gold L, Sawyer C, Magaw R, Backman G, de Veciana M, Levinson R, Hooper N, Havender W,<br />

Bernstein L, Peto R, Pike M and Ames B. 1984. A Carcinogenic Potency Database of the<br />

standardized results of animal bioassays. Environ Health Perspect 58:9-319.<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!