09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

Human studies do not provide adequate data for the development of a cancer potency value because of<br />

the presence of confounding factors in the studies (multiple compound exposures, no data on smoking<br />

status) and no reporting of exposure levels. The animal study by Lijinsky (1986) showing development<br />

of thyroid tumors in female rats, and forestomach papillomas and carcinomas in male and female mice<br />

provides data from which cancer potency values can be derived.<br />

Methodology<br />

Cancer potency values were derived by US EPA (1989) from the tumor incidence data presented in the<br />

study by Lijinsky (1986). The experimentally administered doses (15 and 30 mg/kg) were converted to<br />

time-weighted dosage based on the dosing schedule (3 times/week) and the experimental duration<br />

(107.5 weeks). The human equivalent dose (HED) was calculated based on an assumed experimental<br />

animal body weight (bw a ) of 0.35 kg and human body weight (bw h ) of 70 kg using the following<br />

relationship:<br />

HED = time-weighted dose × (bw a /bw h ) 1/3<br />

The calculated human equivalent doses in the Lijinsky (1986) study were 1.06 and 2.12 mg/kg-day. A<br />

linearized multistage procedure (CDHS, 1985) was applied to the tumor incidence data for thyroid<br />

tumors in female rats (4/52 controls, 8/51 low-dose, 14/52 high-dose), forestomach tumors in male<br />

mice (0/51 controls, 5/50 low-dose, 32/52 high-dose) and forestomach tumors in female mice (0/52<br />

controls, 5/50 low-dose, 19/51 high-dose). This resulted in estimations of the upper 95% confidence<br />

bound of cancer potency (q 1 * ) of 0.17, 0.056, and 0.12 (mg/kg-day) -1 , respectively. Selection of the<br />

cancer potency value is made in the most sensitive species and site; therefore, the cancer potency value<br />

[0.17 (mg/kg-day) -1 ] derived from the female rat C-cell thyroid tumor data was chosen.<br />

A unit risk value of 4.9 E-5 (µg/m 3 ) -1 was derived by ATES/<strong>OEHHA</strong> assuming a human breathing rate<br />

of 20 m 3 /day, a human body weight of 70 kg, and 100% fractional absorption after inhalation exposure.<br />

V. REFERENCES<br />

Druckrey H, Kruse H, Preussmann R, Ivankovic S and Landschütz, C. 1970. Cancerogenic alkylating<br />

substances. III. Alkyl-halogenides, -sulfates, -sulfonates and strained heterocyclic compounds. Z<br />

Krebsforsch 74:241-273.<br />

Hazardous Substances Data Bank (HSDB) 1994. National Library of Medicine, Bethesda MD (CD-<br />

ROM Version). Micromedex, Inc., Denver, CO, Edition 22.<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!