09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

several benign adenomatous lesions in the liver, but no statistical comparisons were made. In these<br />

studies, small sample sizes (10 per group), less than lifetime exposure, and excess deaths unrelated to<br />

PCB exposure prevented definitive conclusions about the carcinogenicity of PCBs.<br />

The NCI (1978) conducted a 2-year bioassay on male or female Fisher-344 rats (24 per group)<br />

exposed to Aroclor 1254 in the diet. Concentrations of PCBs in the feed were 0, 25, 50, or 100 ppm.<br />

A significant increase in the numbers of lymphomas and leukemias was observed in the male rats. The<br />

NCI did not conclude that these hematological tumors were treatment related. The incidence of<br />

hepatocarcinomas in the male rats was 0/24, 1/24, and 3/24 for the 0, 50, and 100 ppm groups,<br />

respectively. In other tissues, such as the stomach, jejunum, and cecum, rare tumors were found. The<br />

incidence of these tumors, while not statistically significant, were considered to be treatment-related due<br />

to the low incidence of these tumors in historical controls. The NCI concluded that PCBs were capable<br />

of inducing proliferative lesions in the liver, but were not carcinogenic to rats in this bioassay.<br />

A reanalysis of the NCI data by Morgan et al. (1981) found that the incidence of focal metaplasia in the<br />

stomach increased in a dose-dependent fashion with a 6, 10, 17, and 35% occurrence in the 0, 25, 50,<br />

and 100 ppm groups, respectively. The incidence of stomach adenocarcinomas was significantly higher<br />

than in historical controls (4% vs. 0.03%, p < 0.001). With this reanalysis, the authors concluded that<br />

Aroclor 1254 was carcinogenic.<br />

A chronic dietary exposure to Aroclor 1260 in rats was reported by Kimbrough et al. (1975). In this<br />

study, 200 young rats were fed 0 or 100 ppm Aroclor 1260 for 94 weeks. Actual dosages of PCB<br />

were estimated to be 11.6 mg/kg/day for the first week, 6.1 mg/kg/day at 3 months, and 4.3 mg/kg/day<br />

at 20 months. The time-weighted average dose was estimated to be 4.42 mg/kg/day (U.S. EPA,<br />

1985). Almost all treated rats developed liver nodules (170/184). In addition, the incidence of<br />

hepatocellular carcinomas was highly significantly increased over controls (1/173 for controls vs. 26/184<br />

for treated rats; p < 1.0E-6). Neoplastic nodules and total neoplastic lesions were also highly<br />

significantly increased over concurrent controls.<br />

Schaeffer et al. (1984) reported results from a 2-year bioassay in rats using 2 PCB mixtures: Clophen<br />

A 30 (30% chlorine by weight) and Clophen A 60 (60% chlorine by weight) in the diet. Groups<br />

consisted of approximately 140 male weanling rats exposed to 100 ppm of either Clophen A 30 or<br />

Clophen A 60. A significant increase in the percentage of hepatocellular carcinomas was seen in the<br />

rats treated with Clophen A 60 (62%), but not with Clophen A 30 (3%). Hepatocarcinomas were<br />

observed in 2% of control animals. Preneoplastic lesions were not observed before 71 weeks.<br />

The incidence of hepatocarcinoma was increased in rats exposed to Aroclor 1260 in a 2-year study by<br />

Norback and Weltman (1985). In this study, 70 male or female rats were exposed to 100 ppm<br />

Aroclor 1260 in the diet for 16 months, followed by 50 ppm in the diet for 8 months. The timeweighted<br />

average doses were calculated to be 5 mg/kg/day for the male rats, and 4.2 mg/kg/day for the<br />

females. The incidence of neoplastic lesions in control rats living 18 months or longer was 1.2% (1/81).<br />

The treated rats had an incidence of 95% (45/47) for the females, and 15% (7/46) for the males. The<br />

combined tumor incidences were significantly higher in treated rats compared with controls. The<br />

488

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!