09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

CADMIUM<br />

CAS No: 7440-43-9<br />

I. PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL PROPERTIES (From HSDB (1998) except as noted)<br />

Molecular weight 112.41<br />

Boiling point 765 ºC<br />

Melting point 321 ºC<br />

Vapor pressure 1 mm Hg at 394 ºC<br />

Air concentration conversion 1 ppm = 1.8 mg/m 3 (from NIOSH, 1994)<br />

II.<br />

HEALTH ASSESSMENT VALUES<br />

Unit Risk Factor: 4.2 E-3 (µg/m 3 ) -1<br />

Slope Factor: 1.5 E+1 (mg/kg-day) -1<br />

[Human occupational exposure lung cancer data (Thun et al., 1985), Poisson regression model<br />

fitted by CDHS (1986), resulting model parameters applied to California life table to calculate<br />

cancer risk, reevaluated by CDHS (1990).]<br />

III.<br />

CARCINOGENIC EFFECTS<br />

Human Studies<br />

US EPA has reviewed the epidemiologic evidence on health effects due to cadmium exposure (US<br />

EPA, 1985). Most of the studies were occupational mortality studies in which cause-specific death<br />

rates were compared to expected rates based on a standard population, with the ratio of observed to<br />

expected deaths yielding a standardized mortality ratio (SMR). Outcomes examined in these<br />

investigations included cancer of the respiratory tract, prostate, bladder, kidney, and gastrointestinal<br />

tract. The results were not entirely consistent, but the evidence for an effect of cadmium exposure was<br />

strongest for lung cancer, prostate cancer and renal cancer.<br />

Lemen et al. (1976) found an excess of prostate cancer deaths among 292 workers employed for<br />

greater than two years in a job with potential cadmium exposure. The excess was significant if the<br />

analysis assumed a 20-year latency period. However, a follow-up study of this cohort by Thun et al.<br />

(1985) uncovered no new deaths due to prostatic cancer. The authors suggested that given the<br />

generally nonfatal nature of the disease, mortality studies frequently may not be sensitive enough to<br />

detect a potentially real association with incidence of prostate cancer. Sorahan and Waterhouse (1983,<br />

1985) followed up a 1967 report by Kipling and Waterhouse which had found a highly significant<br />

excess incidence of prostatic cancer. Both the incidence report (Sorahan and Waterhouse, 1985) and<br />

the mortality study (Sorahan and Waterhouse, 1983) found no significantly elevated risk if the original<br />

four index cases were excluded. However, inclusion of these cases in the analysis yielded a highly<br />

significant association. For mortality, using cumulative years of high exposure to cadmium, the p-value<br />

147

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!