09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

RAAC recommendation<br />

An internal Cal/EPA working group should be<br />

established whose specific charge is to insure<br />

agency-wide consistency and harmonization.<br />

Cal/EPA should develop a formalized program for<br />

peer review.<br />

Cal/EPA should seek early input into the risk<br />

assessment process from risk managers and from<br />

external stakeholders. The Agency should identify<br />

effective and efficient mechanisms for participation<br />

by the general public and interested stakeholders<br />

and apply these throughout the Agency.<br />

The Committee recommends that Cal/EPA consider<br />

an approach in conducting chemical risk<br />

assessments that balances the level of effort and<br />

resources with the importance of the risk<br />

assessment.<br />

“Cal/EPA should endeavor to develop future risk<br />

assessments in concert with US EPA, especially<br />

for high volume and/or high risk compounds.<br />

Before Cal/EPA conducts an independent risk<br />

assessment for a substance, it should first review<br />

any existing US EPA risk assessment.”<br />

<strong>TSD</strong> implementation<br />

Cal/EPA-generated cancer potency values<br />

contained in the <strong>TSD</strong> have been reviewed by the<br />

Standards and Criteria Work Group, an internal<br />

Cal/EPA working group, for consistency and<br />

harmonization. The cancer potency factors in the<br />

<strong>TSD</strong> are the same as those in the Standards and<br />

Criteria Workgroup’s document entitled “Criteria<br />

for Carcinogens”.<br />

The <strong>TSD</strong> will be peer reviewed by an advisory<br />

committee of scientists from outside State<br />

government (the Air Resources Board’s Scientific<br />

Review Panel) using a formalized process.<br />

The <strong>TSD</strong> has been reviewed by Cal/EPA risk<br />

assessors and the Air Quality Management and Air<br />

Pollution Control Districts and will be distributed<br />

to interested parties, including external<br />

stakeholders, for public comment. The Cal/EPA<br />

cancer potency factors have already undergone<br />

stakeholder, public and peer review in their<br />

respective programs prior to their inclusion in this<br />

document.<br />

The <strong>TSD</strong> has optimized use of <strong>OEHHA</strong> resources<br />

by developing a decision hierarchy which permits<br />

utilization of previously developed Cal/EPA and<br />

US EPA cancer potency factors.<br />

The <strong>TSD</strong> has incorporated US EPA cancer<br />

potency factors listed in IRIS (as shown in the<br />

Unit Risk and Cancer Potency Factors Table of<br />

the <strong>TSD</strong>) where appropriate. In other cases<br />

California-developed in<strong>format</strong>ion has been used if<br />

it supersedes US EPA in<strong>format</strong>ion, or addresses<br />

compounds still awaiting consideration by US<br />

EPA.<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!