09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

The IARC and US EPA carcinogen classifications for asbestos are 1 and A, respectively – that is, a<br />

known human carcinogen. Ample data exists indicating that asbestos induces lung tumors and<br />

mesotheliomas in both humans and animals. In cases where both human and animal cancer data exist<br />

for a substance and both are suitable for quantitative risk assessment, use of the human data is preferred<br />

by <strong>OEHHA</strong>. The cancer quantitative risk assessment of asbestos was therefore based on human<br />

occupational lung cancer and mesothelioma incidence data, since both posed potential population risks<br />

at ambient concentrations of asbestos.<br />

Methodology<br />

The CDHS (1986) risk assessment relies extensively on work done by the Consumer Product Safety<br />

Commission (1983), the National Academy of Sciences (NRC, 1984), Nicholson (1985), and the<br />

Ontario Royal Commission (1984). As with these risk assessments, the DHS risk assessment on<br />

asbestos was based exclusively on the results of occupational epidemiologic studies.<br />

Animal bioassay data were excluded from this analysis as there are numerous epidemiologic studies of<br />

populations occupationally exposed to asbestos, which contain or have been supplemented with<br />

exposure data adequate for purposes of quantitative risk assessment.<br />

DHS adapted linear models developed and/or used in the work cited above to estimate risks of<br />

mesothelioma and lung cancer to the general population. The models extrapolate risks observed in<br />

numerous occupationally exposed cohorts to lower levels of asbestos found in the general environment.<br />

In this case the range of extrapolation was four to five orders of magnitude. Results are presented<br />

below.<br />

Table 3: Estimated lifetime risks of lung cancer and mesothelioma due to continuous exposure to<br />

0.0001 fibers/cm 3 of asbestos (expressed as cases per million population)<br />

Exposure Group Lung Cancer Mesothelioma<br />

Male Smokers 11 (110) 24 (120)<br />

Female Smokers 5 (50) 32 (160)<br />

Male Nonsmokers 2 (15) 32 (160)<br />

Female Nonsmokers 1 (6) 38 (190)<br />

Numbers in parentheses represent approximate upper 95% confidence limits.<br />

The use of excess lung cancer lifetime risk values between 11 and 110 per million for 0.0001<br />

fibers/cm 3 * of asbestos exposure were recommended. (*Fiber/cm 3 = asbestos fibers ≥ 5µm in length,<br />

≥ 0.3 µm in width, with a length/width ratios of ≥ 3:1. Such fiber counts can be converted to total fibers<br />

measurable by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) by multiplying by 100 to 1,000. Therefore,<br />

0.0001 (PCM) fibers/cm 3 = 0.01 to 0.1 TEM fibers/cm 3 = 10,000 to 100,000 TEM fibers/m 3 .) For<br />

77

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!