09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

US EPA Calculation of Carcinogenic Potency Based on Human Data<br />

US EPA states that existing human epidemiologic studies with sufficiently valid exposure characterization<br />

are always used in evaluating the cancer potency of a chemical. If they show a carcinogenic effect, the<br />

data are analyzed to provide an estimate of the linear dependence of cancer rates on lifetime cancer<br />

dose ( equivalent to the factor q 1 * ). If no carcinogenic effect is demonstrated and carcinogenicity has<br />

been demonstrated in animals, then it is assumed that a risk does exist, but it is smaller than could have<br />

been observed in the epidemiologic study. An upper limit of cancer incidence is calculated assuming<br />

that the true incidence is just below the level of detection in the cohort studied, which is largely<br />

determined by the cohort size. Whenever possible, human data are used in preference to animal data.<br />

In human epidemiologic studies, the response is measured as the relative risk of the exposed cohort of<br />

individuals compared to the control group. The excess risk (R(X) - 1, where R(X) is relative risk) is<br />

assumed to be proportional to the lifetime average exposure X, and to be the same for all ages. The<br />

carcinogenic potency is equal to [R(X) - 1]/X multiplied by the lifetime risk at that site in the general<br />

population. The confidence limit for the excess risk is not usually calculated due to the difficulty in<br />

accounting for inherent uncertainty in the data (exposure and cancer response).<br />

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (<strong>OEHHA</strong>), California Environmental<br />

Protection Agency<br />

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment cancer risk assessment procedures are outlined in<br />

“Guidelines for Chemical Carcinogen Risk Assessments and their Scientific Rationale” (referred to<br />

below as the Guidelines) (CDHS, 1985). These procedures are generally used in generating Toxic Air<br />

Contaminant (TAC) cancer potency values (Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section, Office of<br />

Environmental Health Hazard Assessment), standard Proposition 65 cancer potency values<br />

(Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section (RCHAS), Office of Environmental Health<br />

Hazard Assessment) and ATES cancer potency values (Air Toxicology and Epidemiology Section,<br />

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment). Expedited Proposition 65 cancer potency values<br />

(Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section (RCHAS), Office of Environmental Health<br />

Hazard Assessment) depart somewhat from those procedures and are discussed separately below.<br />

<strong>OEHHA</strong> cancer risk assessment methodology (CDHS, 1985) generally resembles that used by US<br />

EPA (Anderson et al., 1983; US EPA, 1986). The Guidelines state that both animal and human data,<br />

when available, should be part of the dose-response assessment.<br />

<strong>OEHHA</strong> Calculation of Carcinogenic Potency Based on Animal Data<br />

The procedures used to extrapolate low-dose human cancer risk from animal carcinogenicity data<br />

assume that a carcinogenic change induced in a cell is transmitted to successive generations of cells<br />

descended from that cell, and that the initial change in the cell is an alteration (e.g. mutation,<br />

rearrangement, etc.) in the cellular DNA. Non-threshold models are used to extrapolate to low-dose<br />

human cancer risk from animal carcinogenicity data.<br />

12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!