09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Ito et al. (1973) exposed groups of 12 mice to 500 ppm Kaneclor 500 (54% chlorine) in the diet for<br />

32 weeks. No liver lesions were seen in 6 untreated controls. The incidence of hepatocellular<br />

carcinoma in the treated mice was 5/12 and the incidence of liver nodules was 7/12.<br />

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

Several studies (Kimbrough et al., 1975; Schaeffer et al., 1984; Norback and Weltman, 1985;<br />

Brunner et al., 1996) have demonstrated increased liver tumor incidence in rats exposed to PCB<br />

mixtures. The mixtures found to induce liver tumors range in chlorine content from 60% (Aroclor 1260;<br />

(Norback and Weltman, 1985; Brunner et al., 1996)), through 54% (Brunner et al., 1996), to 41%<br />

(Brunner et al., 1996). Female Sprague-Dawley rat liver tumor incidence data for Aroclor 1260 from<br />

the study by Norback and Weltman (1985) was chosen by US EPA as the basis of a cancer potency<br />

value for "high risk and persistence" PCB exposures. Female Sprague-Dawley rat liver tumor incidence<br />

data for Aroclor 1242 and 1016 from the study by Brunner et al. (1996) were chosen by US EPA as<br />

the basis of cancer potency values for "low risk and persistence" and "lowest risk and persistence" PCB<br />

exposures, respectively.<br />

Methodology<br />

The September 1996 US EPA document "PCBs: Cancer Dose-Response Assessment and Application<br />

to Environmental Mixtures" (US EPA, 1996a) differs from the prior US EPA PCB risk assessment (US<br />

EPA, 1988) which was also used for Proposition 65 purposes in that it includes data from a new study<br />

of rats fed diets containing Aroclors 1260, 1254, 1242, or 1016 which found statistically significant,<br />

dose-related, increased incidences of liver tumors from each mixture (Brunner et al., 1996). Earlier<br />

studies used in the previous US EPA IRIS listing for PCBs found high, statistically significant incidences<br />

of liver tumors in rats ingesting Aroclor 1260 or Clophen A 60 (Kimbrough et al., 1975; Norback and<br />

Weltman, 1985; Schaeffer et al., 1984) in addition to partial lifetime studies which found precancerous<br />

liver lesions in rats and mice ingesting PCB mixtures of high or low chlorine content. However, the<br />

studies used for the previous IRIS listing had no data available indicating that PCBs with chlorine<br />

contents of less than 60% induced frank tumors.<br />

The new US EPA PCB risk assessment document also uses dose scaling to humans using a factor<br />

based on the ¾ power of relative body weight. Cancer potency is described by an ED10 (estimated<br />

dose associated with 10 percent increased incidence) and its lower bound, LED10. These measures<br />

are expressed as equivalent human doses. Formerly, upper-bound slopes were calculated by the<br />

linearized multistage procedure; these were reported as " q1*"s. The LED10 method and the linearized<br />

multistage procedure give similar upper-bound slopes; for example, for female rats fed Aroclor 1254,<br />

the LED10 method and the linearized multistage procedure give upper-bound slopes of 1.5 and 1.6 per<br />

mg/kg-d, respectively. These changes conform to the 1996 draft US EPA cancer risk assessment<br />

guidelines (US EPA, 1996b).<br />

490

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!