09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

year; 7/16 animals fed acetamide alone for 1 year followed by control diet for 3 months also developed<br />

liver tumors. In contrast, 1/11 animals fed diet containing acetamide + L-arginine L-glutamate for 1<br />

year developed hepatomas, and 1/19 animals fed diet containing acetamide + L-arginine L-glutamate<br />

for 1 year followed by control diet for 3 months developed hyperplastic liver nodules, but not tumors.<br />

No liver tumors were noted in either the control or 5.6% L-arginine L-glutamate treatment groups<br />

(Weisburger et al., 1969).<br />

Fleischman et al.(1980) fed male and female C57BL/6 mice (50/sex/group) and Fischer 344 rats<br />

(50/sex/group) a diet containing 1.18% (mice) or 2.36% (mice, rats) acetamide for 365 consecutive<br />

days; animals were then fed a control diet for an additional 4 months. Male mice demonstrated a<br />

treatment-related increase in hematopoietic tumors, primarily malignant lymphomas; tumor incidence<br />

was 7/50 and 7/46 for the low and high dose groups, respectively, compared to 0/95 for the pooled<br />

(male and female) control group. Neoplastic nodules and hepatocellular carcinomas were observed in<br />

both male and female rats. However, the incidence, speed of onset and frequency of metastases were<br />

greater in males (Fleischman et al., 1980). No liver tumors were noted in control animals. Incidence<br />

data for hepatocellular carcinomas in F344 rats, the most sensitive species tested, are given in Table 1.<br />

Table 1:<br />

Incidence of hepatocellular carcinomas in F344 rats treated with acetamide by dietary<br />

administration (Fleischman et al., 1980).<br />

Dietary Concentration<br />

(%)<br />

Average Dose 1<br />

(mg/kg-day)<br />

Tumor Incidence 2<br />

Male Female<br />

0 0 0/50 0/49<br />

2.36 710 41/47 33/48<br />

1. Doses as reported by Gold et al. (1984).<br />

2. Decreased survival of treatment group according to Gold et al. (1990) (56% survival at study<br />

termination compared to 86% for controls); potency may be an underestimate (Cal/EPA,<br />

1992).<br />

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

The carcinogenicity bioassay by Fleischman et al. (1980) indicated that acetamide causes<br />

hematopoietic tumors in male C57BL/6 mice, and hepatocellular carcinomas in male and female Fischer<br />

344 rats. Rats were more sensitive than mice, and male rats were more sensitive than female rats in this<br />

study; therefore, the male Fischer 344 rat liver tumor data was used as the basis of a cancer potency<br />

factor.<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!