09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

served as untreated controls. One treated dog died at 3.4 years of age because of an infection. The<br />

other animals were killed at 8.3-9 years. Transitional-cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder occurred in<br />

4 of 5 treated dogs (p < 0.025, Fisher exact test), and a composite tumor (transitional-cell<br />

carcinoma/adenocarcinoma) of the urethra was noted in one dog. No urinary tract tumors were noted<br />

in the untreated controls. Tumor incidence data is listed in Table 2.<br />

Table 2.<br />

4, 4'-Methylene bis(2-chloroaniline) (MOCA) -induced urinary bladder tumor<br />

incidence in female beagle dogs (Stula et al., 1977)<br />

Average Dose 1 Tumor Incidence 2<br />

(mg/kg-day)<br />

0 0/6<br />

7.31 4/5<br />

1. Doses as reported by Gold et al. (1984).<br />

2. Tumor incidences as reported by Gold et al. (1984)<br />

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

Results from a number of studies using Charles River CD and Wistar rats, as well as female beagle<br />

dogs, are listed in Gold et al. (1984). 4, 4'-Methylene bis(2-chloroaniline) induced papillary transitional<br />

cell carcinomas of the urinary bladder in dogs, whereas the liver was the most common target site in the<br />

rat studies. Dogs are more sensitive to the carcinogenic effects of the compound than rats. The<br />

compound is similar in structure to benzidine, a human bladder carcinogen, which appears to be<br />

significantly more potent in humans than rodents. Results from the Stula et al. (1977) dog study are<br />

used as the basis of potency estimation, despite the small numbers of animals used, because dogs may<br />

be better predictors of human carcinogenicity of this compound than rodents (Cal/EPA, 1992). Doseresponse<br />

data are listed in Table 2.<br />

Methodology<br />

Expedited Proposition 65 methodology (with cross-route extrapolation) was used to derive a cancer<br />

potency factor. A unit risk factor was then calculated by <strong>OEHHA</strong>/ATES from the cancer potency<br />

factor using a reference human body weight of 70 kg and an inspiration rate of 20 m 3 /day.<br />

V. REFERENCES<br />

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) 1992. Expedited Cancer Potency Values and<br />

Proposed Regulatory Levels for Certain Proposition 65 Carcinogens. Office of Environmental Health<br />

Hazard Assessment, Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, Berkeley, CA.<br />

359

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!