09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ationale for selection of the <strong>OEHHA</strong> unit risk value for NDMA.<br />

Methodologies<br />

Peto et al .(1982, 1984) derived potency values from the incidence data of fatal liver tumors in male<br />

and female Colworth rats. The cumulative risk was calculated based on the assumption that the risk<br />

increases with the seventh power of exposure duration and the observation that a dose of 1.0 µg/kgday<br />

results in a 0.03-0.04% incidence of liver tumors at two years. Estimated cancer potency at low<br />

doses (q animal ) was found to be 0.29 and 0.4 (mg/kg-day) -1 for male and female rats, respectively. Peto<br />

et al. (1982,1984) also scaled these potencies up by a factor of 7 to account for calculated increased<br />

risk from the observation that median experimental animal lifespan was beyond 2 years in this study.<br />

Conversion to human potency values (q human ) was based on the body weight scaling relationship<br />

described below, with an assumed human body weight (bw h ) of 70 kg and experimental animal body<br />

weights (bw a ) of 450 and 250 g for male and female rats:<br />

q human = q animal × (bw h /bw a ) 1/3<br />

The resulting q human values were 12 and 16 (mg/kg-day) -1<br />

respectively.<br />

from the male and female rat data,<br />

Dose rate estimates of 0.82 mg/kg-day for female BALB/c mice receiving NDMA in drinking water in<br />

the study by Terracini et al. (1973) were based on a US EPA (1988) reference animal body weight<br />

value and water consumption rate (CDHS, 1988). Using a multistage procedure, experimental<br />

potencies (q 1 * ) derived from this dose rate using the incidence of lung tumors in F 0 and F 1 generation<br />

animals were 1.5 and 1.6 (mg/kg-day) -1 , respectively. Potency in animals (q animal ) was estimated<br />

assuming cancer incidence increases with the third power of age, with T e the experimental duration and<br />

T the natural lifespan of the animals (104 weeks):<br />

q animal = q 1 * × (T/T e ) 3<br />

Further conversion to human cancer potencies with a body weight scaling factor were made as<br />

described for Peto et al.(1982,1984) resulting in human potency estimates (q human ) of 49 and 53<br />

(mg/kg-day) -1 from the F 0 and F 1 generation mouse tumor incidence data, respectively.<br />

High- and low-dose rates estimates of 0.80 and 0.35 mg/kg-day in the study by Lijinsky and Reuber<br />

(1984) were based on US EPA (1988) animal body weight reference values in the induction of liver<br />

tumors in Fischer 344 rats (CDHS, 1988). Using the Crouch (1983) correction for variable dosing and<br />

a multistage procedure, the animal cancer potency estimate (q animal ) was 5.8 (mg/kg-day) -1 . Using the<br />

body weight conversion factor as described in the Peto et al. (1982, 1984) potency derivation<br />

(bw a =0.229 kg; US EPA, 1988), the resulting q human was 39 (mg/kg-day) -1 .<br />

Dose rate estimates to MRC Porton rats exposed to NDMA in diet in the study by Terracini et al.<br />

(1967) were made by the method of Crouch (1983) to account for variable dosing during the course of<br />

the experiment (CDHS, 1988). Using liver tumor incidence among female rats surviving less than 60<br />

404

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!