09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

IV.<br />

DERIVATION OF CANCER POTENCY<br />

Basis for Cancer Potency<br />

4, 4'-Methylenedianiline<br />

The potency for this compound was derived from the potency for the dihydrochloride using a<br />

molecular weight conversion:<br />

q (anhydrous) = q (hydrate)<br />

h h<br />

×<br />

MW (hydrate)<br />

MW (anhydrous)<br />

where q h is the human potency and MW is the molecular weight. This conversion assumes that the<br />

intake of equivalent moles of the two forms of the chemical (e.g. the anhydrous and hydrate forms)<br />

results in equivalent concentrations of the active species in vivo.<br />

4, 4'-Methylenedianiline didihydrochloride<br />

Results are listed for the drinking water studies by NTP (1983) in male and female B6C3F 1<br />

mice and F344 rats. Significant increases in tumors of the liver or thyroid or both are observed for all<br />

sex/species combinations tested, with male mice the most sensitive. The cancer potency listed is based<br />

on the combined incidence of benign and malignant liver tumors in male mice (Cal/EPA, 1992).<br />

Methodology<br />

Expedited Proposition 65 methodology (with cross-route extrapolation) was used to derive a cancer<br />

potency factor. Analysis of the data set using the computer program TOX_RISK (Crump et al., 1991)<br />

indicated that inclusion of the high dose group resulted in a p-value of = 0.05 based on the chi-square<br />

goodness-of-fit test, indicating non-linearity. Following procedures described by US EPA (Anderson<br />

et al., 1983), the high dose group was excluded from the analysis to correct for the poor fit (Cal/EPA,<br />

1992). A unit risk factor was then calculated by <strong>OEHHA</strong>/ATES from the cancer potency factor using a<br />

reference human body weight of 70 kg and an inspiration rate of 20 m 3 /day.<br />

V. REFERENCES<br />

Anderson EL and the Carcinogen Assessment Group of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency<br />

1983. Quantitative approaches in use to assess cancer risk. Risk Anal 3:277-295.<br />

California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) 1992. Expedited Cancer Potency Values and<br />

Proposed Regulatory Levels for Certain Proposition 65 Carcinogens. Office of Environmental Health<br />

Hazard Assessment, Reproductive and Cancer Hazard Assessment Section, Berkeley, CA.<br />

371

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!