09.02.2014 Views

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

home edit2 whole TSD November 2002 PDF format - OEHHA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

procedure (NLIN), the parameters were estimated at:<br />

α ∧ = 0.500 (unitless parameter) and<br />

∧<br />

β = 0.0017 (cumulative mg-days/m 3 ) -1<br />

the 95% (two-tailed) upper confidence limit for β was 0.0079, and the χ 2 goodness-of-fit statistic was<br />

0.15 (1 df, p = 0.70). Lung cancer deaths predicted by the model were compared with the observed<br />

lung cancer deaths for the three exposure groups (Table 7).<br />

Table 7:<br />

Lung Cancer Deaths Among Cadmium-Exposed Workers: Observed And Predicted<br />

(Data of Thun et al., 1985)<br />

Cumulative Exposure Groups<br />

Low Middle High<br />

Observed 2 6 7<br />

Predicted * 2.94 5.99 7.44<br />

* Linear relative risk model with healthy worker effect, U.S. controls.<br />

With these estimates of the parameters, the model was then applied to the California population to<br />

predict the excess number of lung cancer deaths induced by cadmium exposure. First, a current life<br />

table was produced for California males and females separately, using five-year age intervals. The<br />

background hazard of lung cancer death for each five-year age interval was calculated using 1980<br />

census data for California (Bureau of the Census, 1982) and age-specific death rates for California from<br />

1979-80 vital statistics data (California Department of Health Services, 1982) by standard statistical<br />

techniques (Chiang, 1984). These were then summed over a lifetime.<br />

Next, using the estimated value for β and setting α = 1 for the general population (i.e. no healthy<br />

worker effect), the hazard of lung cancer death given a continuous lifetime exposure to 1 µg/m 3 cadmium<br />

was calculated from the model. Using these hazard rates, a new life table was constructed. Subtracting<br />

the background probability of a lung cancer death from that obtained for an exposed population resulted<br />

in a range of risk for excess lifetime cancer from 2 × 10 -3 to 1.2 × 10 -2 (µg/m 3 ) -1 . CDHS also suggested<br />

that a “best” cancer unit risk value for regulatory purposes was 1.6 × 10 -3 (µg/m 3 ) -1 for cadmium in air.<br />

CDHS (1990) reviewed the previous CDHS (1986) estimate of parameters generated from the fit of<br />

the Poisson regression model to the Thun et al. (1985) lung tumor data. The 97.5% upper confidence<br />

limit for β was calculated for a number of values of α that were in the range 0.5 < α < 1.0. All of the<br />

calculated 97.5% upper confidence limit for β were less than the corresponding values calculated from<br />

the statistical analysis program used previously by CDHS (1986).<br />

CDHS (1990) decided that it is reasonable to restrict α to values between 0.5 and 1.0. If α were less<br />

158

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!